"alesj" wrote :
| Or if the newly/additionally added "deploy" folder is not high volume,
| does it still make sense to permanently cache it?
|
The problem is that the current deployers & VFS design is *very* dependent on
permanent caching of VFS roots, per the discussion here:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/2009-April/014187.html
So, anything which doesn't use it will eventually fail (unless they aren't using
temps).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4232783#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...