[jboss-dev-forums] [Design of Clustering on JBoss (Clusters/JBoss)] - Re: Used of JGroups shared transport in AS 5

"bstansberry(a)jboss.com" wrote : The AS fix is still hacky though, as the method signatures of the two createMultiplexerChannel methods include other params besides the stack name that are now totally ignored. Hmmm, I suppose you can always indicate this in the AS's ChannelFactory javadoc? As long as it's noted somewhere, doesn't look that bad. It's certainly safer than returning different type of objects depending on whether its shared transport or multiplexer. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4145874#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...