"emuckenhuber" wrote : Hmm yes, as the serviceRefName is used for jndi binding
this could lead to a conflict.
| I mean i think decalaringClass / name makes more sense and would avoid this. And as
you mentioned that the spec is unclear on this, we maybe should use the default naming
like it was in beta4!?
OK, that's fine with me (using the default name declaringClass / name).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160117#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...