anonymous wrote :
| The code changes for this approach are minimal. What you've done already, plus an
attribute in the ear metadata (defaulting to 'strict') to control whether to set
the DeploymentInfo flag or not, (plus fixing the failing test by adding the
'implicit' flag).
|
This works fine , I have tested it on my local system ....
anonymous wrote :
| -1. The testcase ear is a perfectly valid deployment, and I doubt it's unusual in
the real world. I know at my previous employer we had several ears like this. (I
didn't write the testcase ear, so I'm not responsible for both examples ;) )
|
I am not sure if bstansberry would vote for changing the deployment descriptors .i.e
modifying the test cases.
The approach looks ok to me now
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3967423#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...