"wolfc" wrote : This is becoming ugly. | A deployment scope was meant to denote a JavaEEApplication (/ EAR) and thus it implements it as such. If the usage has changed we should at least disconnect DeploymentScope from JavaEEApplication. | Its a resolution context/api now. Is the JavaEEApplication still useful? "wolfc" wrote : | Furthermore the determination of whether there is an EAR or not appears to be broken. As the jboss-seam-dvd application gets deployed with a deployment scope with a null base name. I'll have to see why that is. I see Ales has added back in a hack to check the deployment unit suffix for ".ear" to get the jboss-seam-dvd application to work. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157127#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...