"jaikiran" wrote : 2) Since we are trying to test the core functionality, should we be having this testcase within the ejb3-core instead of the proxy module? Yes, let's move this Unit Test to EJB3 Core so we get the proper Invocation marshalling tested. "jaikiran" wrote : 3) Is there some way to get hold of the real containers in the proxy module testcases? Nope, doing so would introduce a cyclic dependency unless more major surgery extracted the Containers code from EJB3 Core into a new module upon which both Core and Proxy could depend. (Not really a task for now) ;) S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4178462#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...