anonymous wrote :
| The original versions were crap, that is unless you never wanted to change
| your schema/code.
|
Quite right, but as I pointed out, JAXB 2.0 seemed to mitigate this
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=86414
and
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=95273
Since I was originally planning on using JAXB to do the *-dsx.xml binding (note, this is
not *-ds.xml but an updated and more rigorous version with an associated XSD) can I assume
that we are going to allow for JAXB in our new meta model implementation(s). Because, if
so, I can officially delete all the JBossXB crap I had to do up until this point. This
would seem to hold for the ejb3 stuff which was done using JBossXB as well...
You know..the code you hate ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4005866#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...