"bstansberry(a)jboss.com" wrote : The AS fix is still hacky though, as the method
signatures of the two createMultiplexerChannel methods include other params besides the
stack name that are now totally ignored.
Hmmm, I suppose you can always indicate this in the AS's ChannelFactory javadoc? As
long as it's noted somewhere, doesn't look that bad. It's certainly safer than
returning different type of objects depending on whether its shared transport or
multiplexer.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4145874#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...