October 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: AbstractDeploymentUnit.getMetaDataFiles()

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : I have always thought jar urls were fundamentally flawed since they never have dealt with nested jars, and mix content with another protocol. Its also not really a protocol issue. I would like jar urls to disappear and whether or not a file was a compressed archive be a detail of the VFS. | That's great you want to do this, but various SPIs in JavaEE5 require passing valid URLs. I'm running into this problem right now with nested jars within an EAR. PU need to pass in URL of the persistence.xml file but it is fucked up URL: jar:file:/.../foo.ear!/ejb.jar/META-INF/persistence.xml URL handler tries to open ejb.jar/META-INF/persistence.xml as a JarEntry within foo.ear (which its not obviously) Are we going to do: vfs:file:/.../foo.ear/ejb.jar/META-INF/persistence.xml? Is this something I can work on please as it is blocking me. Thanks, Bill View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979442#3979442 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979442

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: How to store EPRs in the registry?

by kurt.stam＠jboss.com

OK you confused me there :). Everything evolves and will be changing over time, especially in our world of software. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979426#3979426 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979426

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: How to store EPRs in the registry?

by mark.little＠jboss.com

No, I'm not suggesting dropping JAX-R or UDDI. By "good enough" I meant: let's just take a schema along the lines of the one you outlined and use that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979425#3979425 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979425

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: How to store EPRs in the registry?

by kurt.stam＠jboss.com

We have chosen JAXR-1.0 for this release, so I would think that drives the "good enough"? We need to put a stake in the ground somewhere.. I mean we can let go of JAXR (or wait for 2.0) if that's what you're suggesting, but as you say for 4.0 that's not really an option anymore. Also we'd like to people to use their existing UDDI systems right? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979424#3979424 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979424

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: How to store EPRs in the registry?

by kurt.stam＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : This is all in a state of flux now that WS-A has become a standard and UDDI evolves. However, what we do for the initial release doesn't necessarily have to be the way we continue to do things. So I think if we can agree on a "good enough" approach for the 4.0 release, we can revisit this later. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979422#3979422 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979422

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: How to store EPRs in the registry?

by mark.little＠jboss.com

"kurt.stam(a)jboss.com" wrote : anonymous wrote : Is this not where the Logical Name comes in? From the outset we've talked about two types of names: | | | | (i) the "physical" name, which is the EPR and needed to address the service. This name may be obtained from the Registry or from elsewhere. But the Registry is the preferred approach. | | | | (ii) the "logical" name, which is a convenient short-hand, like "Kurt's Travel Agency". Obviously in order to interact with a service you need a real address, so if all you've got is a logical name you need some way of mapping one to the other. That's where the Registry comes in again. The Registry maintains a tuple space of <logical name, physical name>. | | | | We could set the logical name as the URI. As you say, something like: epr:jbossesb:version:1.0:logicalname:KurtsTravelAgency | | Every Service and ServiceBinding can have a name. This name is used when querying for a service. The physical and logic names you refer to are more 'addresses' to me. But I agree with what you say. | | OK so I guess we now have: | -ServiceBinding.name = "Kurt's Travel Angency" | -ServiceBinding.URI = "epr:jbossesb:version:1.0:logicalname:KurtsTravelAgency" | I'm going to see how we should be using the 'tModel' to store the EPR. I think it will be something like this: | -ServiceBinding.Concept = the EPR-XML | -ServiceBinding.Classification = "jbossesb-aware" | but let me look into this a little. | | I pretty sure we gain searchability from classifying things. So the way we organize things may help us when searching for a Service. | | --Kurt This is all in a state of flux now that WS-A has become a standard and UDDI evolves. However, what we do for the initial release doesn't necessarily have to be the way we continue to do things. So I think if we can agree on a "good enough" approach for the 4.0 release, we can revisit this later. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979419#3979419 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979419

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: How to store EPRs in the registry?

by kurt.stam＠jboss.com

Small correction. ServiceBinding does not actually have a name (not implemented on the UDDI side), but it's parent Service does. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979412#3979412 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979412

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Messaging and Remoting

by mladen.turk＠jboss.com

I would like to give my 2 cents to the subject. I spoke with Tom, and I have a (well sort off) working multiplex implementation. It can be found at: http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossnative/sandbox/mux/ (although it has nothing to do with the native for the moment) The point is to have a TCP/IP interface over a single socket, thus allowing both TCP and UDP protocols. In essence it's a ssl tunneling without ssl (can be added) and usable via API, not as an OS layer. The entire concept is based on HTTP-NG http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP-NG/ View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979405#3979405 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979405

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: How to store EPRs in the registry?

by kurt.stam＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : At the moment we're really looking at the first steps though: more like a basic naming service. So I wouldn't expect we're looking at anything more complex than an EPR. Would you? No, I agree for now EPR is what we should be going after, I just brought this up as an analogy. anonymous wrote : Is this not where the Logical Name comes in? From the outset we've talked about two types of names: | | (i) the "physical" name, which is the EPR and needed to address the service. This name may be obtained from the Registry or from elsewhere. But the Registry is the preferred approach. | | (ii) the "logical" name, which is a convenient short-hand, like "Kurt's Travel Agency". Obviously in order to interact with a service you need a real address, so if all you've got is a logical name you need some way of mapping one to the other. That's where the Registry comes in again. The Registry maintains a tuple space of <logical name, physical name>. | | We could set the logical name as the URI. As you say, something like: epr:jbossesb:version:1.0:logicalname:KurtsTravelAgency Every Service and ServiceBinding can have a name. This name is used when querying for a service. The physical and logic names you refer to are more 'addresses' to me. But I agree with what you say. OK so I guess we now have: -ServiceBinding.name = "Kurt's Travel Angency" -ServiceBinding.URI = "epr:jbossesb:version:1.0:logicalname:KurtsTravelAgency" I'm going to see how we should be using the 'tModel' to store the EPR. I think it will be something like this: -ServiceBinding.Concept = the EPR-XML -ServiceBinding.Classification = "jbossesb-aware" but let me look into this a little. I pretty sure we gain searchability from classifying things. So the way we organize things may help us when searching for a Service. --Kurt View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979398#3979398 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979398

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: ClassNotFoundException when running ejb3 clustered in 4.

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

This looks a classLoader isolation problem for me. I have moved this to Dev Forum because: I - This is a dev related activity (performance tests) II - It looks like a bug View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979392#3979392 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979392

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums October 2006