October 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - AOP Metadata context

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

Linking to this in the AOP forum from here in case it doesn't get picked up there http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=85442 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979178#3979178 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979178

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - AOP/MC integration with security enabled

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

I've added a run of tests using a security manager for http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAOP-240 All tests pass fine; for the JMXDecoratedTestCase I needed to add a properties file for the TestsPolicyPlugin to configure MBeanPermissions: | test.Permission.1=javax.management.MBeanPermission, *#*, getMBeanInfo,invoke,registerMBean | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979171#3979171 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979171

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Admin Console] - AGWTWebBasedManagement Console

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

The author of this project sent me the following links. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=177395 http://sourceforge.net/project/screenshots.php?group_id=177395 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979170#3979170 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979170

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Eclipse IDE (dev)] - Re: JBoss5 integration

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Cross project issues to synch releases on: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3774 http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-384 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979169#3979169 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979169

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Messaging and Remoting

by timfox

"genman" wrote : | | You need a framing protocol, and I would get to work implementing AMQP right away. Then later, or simultaneously, abstract AMQP into one of the JBoss remoting system. | | I agree with most of this - we need a multiplex transport based on a framing protocol. I don't think there is a need to implement AMQP fully at this point. But if we get the foundations right then it should be easy to build on top if/when the need arises. Agreed this should then be abstracted back into remoting so others can re-use it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979167#3979167 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979167

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Eclipse IDE (dev)] - JBoss5 integration

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

A thread to discuss integration between the ide and jboss5. The main 3 levels which with the ide will need to integrate are: - vfs - a simple read-only virtual file abstraction. It does have a simple link notion that allows for virtual archives to be composed of various files so that one does not explicitly need to create war/ejb archives. - deployers - structural and runtime deployment spi. This could be used directly by the ide for one off deployments. - profile service - a collection of deployments as a named profile. This would be used by the ide if one wants a notion of a collection of deployments being part of a project. See http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBoss5DeploymentFramework for how these relate. The vfs/structrual deployers in the middle of another refactoring that needs to be completed before we can discuss how to use it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979166#3979166 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979166

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: JBAS-3766, port the webservice deployer

by jason.greene＠jboss.com

On this topic, I have created an issue for XML overrides that will need to pull from the new metadata model http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWS-1309 -Jason View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979164#3979164 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979164

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Messaging and Remoting

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"genman" wrote : | I may not have a lot to add, but I did read the AMQP and SEDA specifications out of curiousity. | | In my opinion, it's quicker (and oddly pleasant) to craft something out of a formal specification, than to work on your own protocol. How does it go? "Bad artists copy. Great artists steal." | | You need a framing protocol, and I would get to work implementing AMQP right away. Then later, or simultaneously, abstract AMQP into one of the JBoss remoting system. | | Agreed its better to drive requirements from specifics. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979162#3979162 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979162

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Messaging and Remoting

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"timfox" wrote : I originally started this discussion (in the thread Ovidiu pointed out) since after working deeeply with remoting with some time I started to wonder whether it is the right fit for our project. | ... | We certainly should not be using our custom transport in the longer time. | | At the end of the day we want to build the best messaging system out there and don't want to be prevented from this goal because of this. This is currently our #1 risk. I agree that there is a conflict in terms of timeframe and existing features. I don't see that there is any inherent conflict with an efficient messaging transport and an rpc transport. Its just an issue of correctly layering the concepts. The only question in my mind is whether there are sufficient issues in the tradeoff between performance and the overhead of a layered transport implementation. At this point I don't see that we can make that call. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979159#3979159 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979159

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Messaging and Remoting

by genman

I may not have a lot to add, but I did read the AMQP and SEDA specifications out of curiousity. In my opinion, it's quicker (and oddly pleasant) to craft something out of a formal specification, than to work on your own protocol. How does it go? "Bad artists copy. Great artists steal." You need a framing protocol, and I would get to work implementing AMQP right away. Then later, or simultaneously, abstract AMQP into one of the JBoss remoting system. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979158#3979158 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3979158

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums October 2006