October 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: extending form / task functionality

by cocampo

"kukeltje" wrote : We then have the combination of direct sequential execution of tasks and real pageflows separated from the processdefinition. | | If at least we (you and I) have these requirements, I bet they are interesting engouh for others as well. I'll file a jira issue to develop this functionality in jBPM I don't know about others, but it seems to me this could be a really nice feature to have, since most processes (e.g. people executing processes) involve some kind of GUI. Let me explain further on this subject: regarding BPM, business process modeling and applications development, I tend to think in terms of processes and not applications (kind of 'process driven development'); this way, processes need applications, or even fine-grained pieces of an application (maybe just a single page for a given task). If we had this feature in jBPM, we would have an 'integrated' view of our model, considering the process by itself, along with people (roles), and applications (JSF/Facelets pages). Somehow, jBPM engine should be able to figure it out what path to follow, given the process definition, and using process instance variables state. This way, you won't have to embbed any "navigation" logic in your Java code (not even in faces-config files), since this would be handled by the jBPM engine. What do you think on this?. Regards. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3978254#3978254 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3978254

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Update on metadata progress

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

yup. The reason? ENC refs/injection is one thing that is shared... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3978243#3978243 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3978243

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Using annotations to define schema mappings

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

So should we look at taking the sun jaxb xsd metamodel and move away from the xerces specific code or is it trading one problem for another? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3978242#3978242 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3978242

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Ordering of nested deployments

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | This is case where deployer and container are incorrectly mixed together. | ROOT.war is a runtime component that shouldn't be part of the | deployer deployment. Not that I disagree, and have said we should pull the ROOT.war out of the tomcat sar in the past. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3978240#3978240 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3978240

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Need more metadata for the JARStructure deployer

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | anonymous wrote : | | 2. Its not traversing directories it should, for example, a child directory in top level deployment (jbossweb-tomcat6.deployer/jsf-libs). | | | | Why should it? Because it does in jboss4. As we discussed, we need to remove the isArchive from the VFS, and come up with an explicit structural deployment phase that allows for both jboss and hibernate to analyze a deployment. The output of this should be a StructureMetaData model that can be used by the MainDeployer to produce DeploymentContexts. The DeploymentContext is currently too heavy an object to just be a representation of a deployment structure. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3978238#3978238 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3978238

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Update on metadata progress

by wmprice

>From what I understand there is to be a 'conclusive' metadata model that spans multiple EE domains (RAR, WAR, EAR). Is this correct? I am assuming that we will all use Adrian's framework and that previous code (see RARDeployer and prototype DSXML deployer) will be migrated to the new framework. Basically an enormous, honking, parsing, marshalling/unmarshalling layer right? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3978237#3978237 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3978237

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Using annotations to define schema mappings

by jason.greene＠jboss.com

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : I think overridding annotations would be relatively trivial in XsdBinder. | | I don't know that it could use real XPath though since Xerces' XSModel | is not a DOM model. It is more what the xml specs call an | "information set", but don't know it is formal enough to apply this: | http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath#infoset Well you could parse the xsd into dom first, then apply the xpath, then load the modified dom into an XSModel. -Jason View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3978235#3978235 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3978235

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Update on metadata progress

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"bdecoste" wrote : Long live XB! | | Bill, back in Westford we talked about migrating or supporting the old metadata model. I'm just starting new some tasks - do we still want to do that? I have merged the web tier metadata parsing back into the org.jboss.metadata tree as part of the war deployer update. Its just a merge of the new ObjectModelFactory code into an ObjectModelFactory that encompasses the legacy XmlLoadable parsing. I'm checking this in today. The annotation processing and injection handling still needs to be refactored. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3978234#3978234 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3978234

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: AbstractDeploymentUnit.getMetaDataFiles()

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I have always thought jar urls were fundamentally flawed since they never have dealt with nested jars, and mix content with another protocol. Its also not really a protocol issue. I would like jar urls to disappear and whether or not a file was a compressed archive be a detail of the VFS. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3978232#3978232 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3978232

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Aspectized JACC deployment layer

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"wmprice" wrote : Was there a dev call? Was this open to anyone? Is this something you guys schedule on a regular basis? | Its a post call on the javaee5 tck status since the reworking of the deployers is changing how the ee container deployments are done. Anyone can join. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3978230#3978230 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3978230

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums October 2006