November 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: GpListener reload config - new instance of listeners?

by mark.little＠jboss.com

Let's have a discussion, but I suspect we'll not get time to implement anything until after JBoss World Berlin. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983142#3983142 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983142

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: missing groups for role assignments

by julien＠jboss.com

Bvogt, could you give us a few use case to see what you mean in action ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983127#3983127 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983127

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: GpListener reload config - new instance of listeners?

by jokum

Somebody has some idea about this issue? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983125#3983125 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983125

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: logging too verbose

by mark.little＠jboss.com

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : Even the current issue won't stop the initial beta, so whatever you want to do. OK, not a problem. I'll have a word with John M. when I get back about the long term strategy w.r.t. logging. Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983093#3983093 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983093

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: logging too verbose

by mark.little＠jboss.com

OK, checked. It certainly looks to me like we could add a logger specifically for AS into TS that would do the on-the-fly translation of INFO to TRACE. It would have to be a global translation, i.e., all INFO becomes TRACE, but then I suspect that the vast majority of what we're putting out on INFO you'd want to come out on TRACE when running in AS anyway. I'm out SCUBA diving next week, so I'll have a word with the team and see what's possible. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983092#3983092 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983092

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: logging too verbose

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Even the current issue won't stop the initial beta, so whatever you want to do. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983091#3983091 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983091

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: logging too verbose

by mark.little＠jboss.com

I'll check the current issue first and maybe we can put the logging merge as a background/concurrent task in case it looks like delaying the release? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983087#3983087 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983087

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: logging too verbose

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Its been a todo to merge the jboss and arjuna logging to finally add i18n support, and John M had been asking about this from the ON perspective as well. Maybe that needs to be done as part of this integration as well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983085#3983085 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983085

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: logging too verbose

by mark.little＠jboss.com

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : Background events are not something we want on the console(INFO). Just filtering them out is not something we want to do either as then even the server.log (which defaults to DEBUG level) would not have this info. Generally such background processing is a TRACE level event in terms of the jbossas levels. We could live with DEBUG though. | I'll take a look and see what the easiest solution is short-term. anonymous wrote : | Differing views on logging levels is the bane of all logging frameworks. In the absence of mechanism to map a given (category,level) pair onto a (category,jbossas-level) I don't know how to reconcile this. Can we create a org.jboss.logging.LoggerPlugin that bridges between the arjuna logging framework and the jbossas framework? | We probably already have that capability. We don't access the logger implementation directly, but go through a plugin framework. It may be possible to have a plugin specifically for AS that does the mapping transparently to TS. That may even be the easiest short-term solution! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983084#3983084 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983084

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: logging too verbose

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Background events are not something we want on the console(INFO). Just filtering them out is not something we want to do either as then even the server.log (which defaults to DEBUG level) would not have this info. Generally such background processing is a TRACE level event in terms of the jbossas levels. We could live with DEBUG though. Differing views on logging levels is the bane of all logging frameworks. In the absence of mechanism to map a given (category,level) pair onto a (category,jbossas-level) I don't know how to reconcile this. Can we create a org.jboss.logging.LoggerPlugin that bridges between the arjuna logging framework and the jbossas framework? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983083#3983083 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983083

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2006