November 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: ServiceControllerMBean cleanup

by weston.price＠jboss.com

Looks good. The new JCA stuff is going to need this. In fact, this was the original point of the task for programmatic deployment. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989155#3989155 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989155

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: ServiceControllerMBean cleanup

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

So the dependency on DeploymentInfo would be dropped, and the following metadata based install methods exposed: | public interface ServiceControllerExtMBean extends ServiceControllerMBean | { | public void install(ObjectName name, Object object) throws DeploymentException; | public List<ObjectName> install(List<ServiceMetaData> metaDatas, ObjectName loaderName) throws DeploymentException; | public ObjectName install(ServiceMetaData metaData, ObjectName loaderName) throws DeploymentException; | } | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989153#3989153 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989153

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: HAConnectionFactory UseCase question

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I can encapsulate II, so its the more general and preferred approach. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989151#3989151 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989151

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Usage of OID on ConnectionFactories

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

One of the issues we had on ConnectionFactories and HAs was the need of using a sequence ID (OID) on ConnectionFactories (ClientConnectionFactoryDelegate and its respective ServerEndpoint). After a design session with Tim we decided to stop using OIDs on AOPDispatcher for ConnectionFactories. Now a ConnectionFactory *need* to specify a ClientID on the MBean constructor and that will be used to register the factory on JMSDispatcher. Also.. that will be an issue when a customer is upgrading his version.. A customer would need to define the ClientID or the ConnectionFactory won't work, but we will have an exception clearing that. We could take the action of using a sequence case clientID is null (something we will have to think about later). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989150#3989150 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989150

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: HAConnectionFactory UseCase question

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

It would be great if anyone outside of JBoss Messaging team raises his preference on this thread. what's the best option? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989147#3989147 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989147

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Communication with client

by kksenthil76

Hi, I am into JBOSS research, I would like to know how the Message passed from SOAP client or Java client to apache AXIS through JBOSS. Is that through socket or rmi communication between SOAP client/java client to JBOSS. Let me know the API also. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989144#3989144 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989144

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - ServiceControllerMBean cleanup

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I would like to drop the DeploymentInfo references in the ServiceControllerMBean coming in via the validateDeploymentState(DeploymentInfo di, DeploymentState state) method, and expose the non-xml based install methods of org.jboss.system.ServiceController to allow testing of programatic construction of services. Is there a point to keeping the org.jboss.test.system.controller.legacy as implementing ServiceControllerMBean? If there is the metadata based install methods can be added as a subinterface. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989140#3989140 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989140

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: Programmatic deployment--Redux

by weston.price＠jboss.com

Ok, thanks for the clarification. Well, the RARDeployer doesn't use the old MBeans, it's the XSL and DS deployers and that's not going away anytime soon, at least until I start migrating things over to MC/AOP. The programmatic deployment stuff was supposed to be an interim step along the way but once I started really looking at it things were not as straightforward as I initially thought. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989139#3989139 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989139

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Collaboration Server] - Re: Current status of Project

by acoliver＠jboss.org

I emailed you offline. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989138#3989138 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989138

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: Programmatic deployment--Redux

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Structure deployers do not produce metadata attachments. They only build a deployment structure with classpath info from the vfs view of a deployment archive. They handle the aspect of recognizing a deployment given a uri pointer to it. The only hacky thing I see about the RARDeployer is use of the old mbeans. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3989136#3989136 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3989136

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2006