November 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: behind the scene changes in gpd

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

The model was a mess really. So the refactoring had to be done in order to accomodate for full JPDL support and also in order to more easily support other languages in the future (BPMN, XPDL, ...). While doing the refactoring, I have used inspiration found in the Eclipse GMF project, to split the notation part (the boxes and arrows) from the semantic part (the states, mailnodes, tasks, ...) in the model. Splitting this should make it easier to accomodate for graphical things that don't show up in the semantic model (free text comments e.g.) and for semantic things that have no graphical representation. Some of the requested features were already possible with the old model (move transitions) but just didn't make it into the product yet. Some features were not yet possible to support because GEF was not powerful enough (have transition endpoints or bendpoints obey the grid). Another goal is to give the SEAM pageflow editor its own plug-in and factor out the commonalities of both plug-ins into a common base plug-in. The next release of the GPD will occur in the next couple of weeks if everything goes according to plan and will be 3.1.0 alpha1. I expect it to be reasonably stable but nevertheless contain problems as is not too unexpected after such a major refactoring. Most of the functionality that is available in the last 3.0.x version will also be present. One of the things that will change is that the property dialogs that are brought up by double-clicking on the nodes in the graphical pane or outline will be replaced by tabbed forms in the properties view. All feedback is welcome! Regards, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985960#3985960 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985960

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: coolest feature ever

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

LOL I think Tim's ears whistled while Ronals commented on JBoss messaging :-)) Cheers, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985951#3985951 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985951

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: How to Configure JBPM to use a JMS provider

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

only in 3.2, you'll be able to configure jBPM to use JMS. (and then you can configure any JMS provider in the back). It requires some coding in 3.1.x to bind the jbpm MessageService to JMS. You can look at the 3.2 implementation in CVS and just copy/compile/use that in your own environment. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985942#3985942 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985942

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - How to Configure JBPM to use a JMS provider

by dasriharsha

The JBPM comes with a simple asynchronous messaging system. It also suggests that we can configure the JBPM to custom JMS provider. Are there any documents or pointers on how to configure this to use a JMS provider such as TIBCOJMSProvider? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985940#3985940 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985940

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: @JMX aspect and aop/mc integration

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

Kabir implemented b) above, and I've checked in the addition of the @JMX.registerDirectly() attribute to microcontainer trunk (see http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-109). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985932#3985932 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985932

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Application Server Integration Tests

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : We are using remoting 2.2.0.Alpha2 while Head still using 1.4.something. I'm work with Richard on this issue... He was using an old version of Head because a broken build sometime ago... We are updating his copy now to see what will happen afterwards. So... Trunk is using 2.2.0.Alpha2... it shouldn't be an issue. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985929#3985929 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985929

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Application Server Integration Tests

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : The jms integration should not require scoping in jboss5. There is a problem with Remoting on Head. We are using remoting 2.2.0.Alpha2 while Head still using 1.4.something. I don't know what would take to synchronize that on head. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985928#3985928 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985928

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: coolest feature ever

by timfox

"kukeltje" wrote : it doesn't happen to be jboss messaging right? :-) | | Testing and demos... agree, production? hmmmm.... ;-) I'm not sure I understand your comment kukeltje. Please can you enlighten us? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985907#3985907 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985907

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Default values for MC annotations when running in jboss

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Its just more difficult to override as the scope of the types bound to this version of javassist expands. The question of whether we should be jarjaring javassist does exist independent of putting it into the bootstrap classpath. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985905#3985905 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985905

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Default values for MC annotations when running in jboss

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

I'm probably missing something here, but how does it make a difference if it is deployed in jboss/lib or jboss/server/xxx/ling wrt to being able to use a different version? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985900#3985900 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985900

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2006