November 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: @JMX aspect and aop/mc integration

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

"bstansberry(a)jboss.com" wrote : I was playing with the StandardMBean thing and rebuilt the aop-mc-int-dep.jar from source. After that the DistributedReplicantManager NPE went away. Is the microcontainer snapshot on repository.jboss.com up to date? Now that you mention it, I probably forgot to update it! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985740#3985740 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985740

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Portlet for EJB - Access

by ronfri

Hi I try to access my EJB's via Portlet using JBoss AS and Portal. This EJB-Project already contains a Frontend-Client I want to integrate into a Portlet. Is it possible to use the portlet like a viewer for the Frontend ? I don't want to re-develop the frontend ... Thanks a lot ! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985735#3985735 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985735

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Changes and new tags for the task forms designer

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

looks just perfect! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985732#3985732 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985732

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Dynamic forms

by kukeltje

1: .form files are not for 3.1.3 but for 3.2 2: Correct 3: search the code for forms.xml and trace back where that is all used. (I do not have the main classnames at hand now) 1: Then build your own ui framework. It is doable. We cannot support all existing web frameworks 2: it (might) be possible to use facelets templating 1: Search the discussions in this specific forum. Has been discussed before 2: ???? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985730#3985730 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985730

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: problem with jbossretro on tomcat

by kukeltje

A specific jdk5, would help to. There is a selection as well in my webservices part that uses a property to include jbossws libs for this specific jdk View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985729#3985729 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985729

19 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Attribute handler on ServerPeer

by timfox

Yes, it looks like it's defunct. It shouldn't be null though. It's set in initializeRemoting(): | handler = new JMSServerInvocationHandler(); | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985725#3985725 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985725

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: improving the build

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"david.lloyd(a)jboss.com" wrote : | Maybe it would be a good idea to have a "common" file, and then a specific file for each version that overrides anything that's different, to avoid lots of duplication? | The profiles are just a set of versions of 1) third party libs 2) jbpm modules This can be used to be compatible with a specific JBoss version, but it could also be used to tweak things for other compatibility issues. E.g. another hibernate version, another JSF implementation, ... "david.lloyd(a)jboss.com" wrote : | Just an FYI, I'd like to not be using any snapshot versions by the time we do a final release. Apart from that, everything sounds good. | What is the motivation for this? I would guess that in such times you would want to check if everything works with the versions that will go into the release. no ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985724#3985724 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985724

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: static field replication in PojoCache

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | Can we at least try before we give up ? :-) I don't (currently) see why static vars should only be of primitive types... So, okay, we can create those instances but only replicate them once we have been fully initialized. | I agree that we should not just support static primitives. I can foresee many object models that will use static objects. And I don't see why this should be an issue anyway. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985720#3985720 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985720

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: JBC and RPC

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

Cool, thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985719#3985719 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985719

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Document where non-String FQN do not work, JBCACHE-838

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

And such 'binary' tuples can be searched on? Any idea what the performance impact on this must be like? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3985718#3985718 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3985718

19 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2006