December 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Last chance for any changes to the 2.0.0 API

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | | I still don't know how Node will proxy calls to Cache. Currently, NodeImpl is tied directly to TreeCache. How are these two classes going to interact? | | At the moment I propose each node implementation has a reference to TreeCache since all "real" work happens by making calls to the TreeCache which then passes the call up the interceptor stack. In 2.1.0, this can change, to clean up this otherwise spidery model, but for now I don't want to change this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994628#3994628 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994628

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Last chance for any changes to the 2.0.0 API

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | | Actually, it's pretty close to what I'd like to see. "UnversionedNode" seems a little long for a name. And usually, you use naming to describe what something is, not what it isn't. | | Since access to nodes should take place using the interfaces (Node or NodeSPI), versioning and locking would exist in NodeSPI. As such, an implementation used for Pessimistic Locking, that does not implement versioning would have to throw UnsupportedOperationExceptions for get/setDataVersion() defined in NodeSPI. And hence the descriptive implementation name: UnversionedNode - "a Node implementation that does not implement versioning as defined by the NodeSPI contract". I agree that this negative implementation is a bit awkward, but unless we have a sub-interface to NodeSPI that defines versioning (and is even more awkward IMO) this is the cleaner of the two. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994625#3994625 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994625

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: Runtime profiler - linux 64

by david.stephan

Tried with the CR4 package as well, still no results. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994623#3994623 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994623

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Serialization Compatibility Tests

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

What format would this database be? I presume a txt or xml file? If so, this could reside in cvs, perhaps in the etc/ directory. As for versions, any a.b.x version of JBC needs to be binary compatible with any a.b.y release. So you could maintain a db of all versions to date, but only enforce the checks according to the rule defined. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994620#3994620 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994620

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Other IoC containers support

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

It's the trunk that should be used with the MC. There were changes and the binary snapshot has not been updated yet. Ok, I'll check out the Spring-int tests. It's in the MC, right? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994618#3994618 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994618

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Invocation layers

by MuhammedRafi

I am a beginner in JMS technology If I want to speed up the JMS bus speed which Invocation layer I have 2 use ie.. UIL2 or OIL or RMI invocation layer. my ultimate goal is to fire some thousands of events and to publish thousands of events to the Jboss server using jms. so kindly suggest me in this regards View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994613#3994613 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994613

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Injection Framework

by wolfc

I'm also putting AOP beyond scope for 3 reasons: 1. Can't get an unit test to work in surefire (/maven2) 2. Both EJB3 container and client launcher don't need the extra functionality 3. Can't think of a proper bind-cut without recurssion into the injection framework It should be easy to create a separate module which does injection with AOP. We'll lose the possibility to have a POJO injection classloader. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994611#3994611 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994611

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Injection Framework

by wolfc

With the injection framework it should be possible to easily inject values into beans. Note that the injection framework doesn't specify properties of a bean in the same way as JavaBeans does. Any field or setter method can constitute a property. The injection works in two phases: 1. Setup of the environment 2. Injection of objects The environment could be setup in JNDI, but this is not required by the injection framework. For JNDI setup an implementation is provided. Injection of objects can be specified programatically. For annotation based injection an implementation is provided. It's not IoC or MC injection, because it doesn't take into account dependencies. Although the injection framework contains annotation processors JSR-269 is left out of scope. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994610#3994610 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994610

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Other IoC containers support

by alesj

"alex.loubyansky(a)jboss.com" wrote : Commit or send me a testcase if it's still a problem. I get the same anonymous wrote : | Caused by: org.jboss.xb.binding.JBossXBRuntimeException: -1:-1 5:28 s4s-elt-character: Non-whitespace characters are not allowed in schema elements other than 'xs:appinfo' and 'xs:documentation'. Saw 'The "xml:" Namespace'. exception. If you could have a look at the Spring-int testcase (tests)? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994594#3994594 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994594

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: Runtime profiler - linux 64

by david.stephan

I was using the source from CVS. Should I give the CR4 package a go? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994593#3994593 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994593

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2006