December 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Configuration - normalization

by kurt.stam＠jboss.com

I really don't like leaving the configuration denormalized, but I have taken Tom's arguments to heart and I think I have found the 'happy medium'. In it I have simply nested the host/server/service. I think this flows much better and I think it is very close to what Tom was already working on but taking it one step up in the hierarchy (bringing hosts and servers back). | <hosts> | <host name="filebank" dnsName="localhost"> | <servers> | <server name="fileBankServer" host="fileBank"> | <properties> | <property name="java.naming.provider.url" value="localhost:1099"/> | <property name="java.naming.factory.initial" value="org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContextFactory"/> | <property name="java.naming.factory.url.pkgs" value="org.jboss.naming:org.jnp.interfaces"/> | </properties> | <buses> | <bus name="bank-jms-channel" server="fileBankServer" resourceType="QUEUE" userName="" password=""/> | <bus name="bank-ftp-channel" server="inhouse-jboss-4.0.4" resourceType="FTP" userName="kurt" password="secret"/> | </buses> | <services> | <service name="filebank-gateway" category="gateway" server="loanbroker-listener" description="This listener picks up files deposited by the fileBank" | class="org.jboss.soa.esb.FileBankGateway"> | <listeners> | <listener description="A File-Based listener" bus="bank-ftp-bus"/> | <listener description="A JMS-Based listener" bus="bank-jms-bus"/> | </listeners> | <actions> | <action name="TestDefaultRouteAction" process="route" class="org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.CbrProxyAction" service-category="MessageRouting" | service-name="ContentBasedRoutingService" /> | </actions> | </service> | </services> | </server> | <server name="inhouse-jboss-4.0.4"> | <properties> | <property name="java.naming.provider.url" value="localhost:1099"/> | <property name="java.naming.factory.initial" value="org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContextFactory"/> | <property name="java.naming.factory.url.pkgs" value="org.jboss.naming:org.jnp.interfaces"/> | </properties> | <services> | </server> | <server name="loanbroker-listener" host="loanbroker"/> | </servers> | </host> | <host name="jmsbank" dnsName="localhost"/> | <host name="loanbroker" dnsName="localhost"/> | <host name="jms-provider" dnsName="localhost"/> | </hosts> | So for instance the jndi information for the service or bus is simply found in the encapsulating server element. Question, should a 'bus' be a type of service? I tend to think it is actually. --Kurt View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994215#3994215 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994215

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Federated search

by thomas.heute＠jboss.com

I still want to get user's thoughts to integrate the ideas to our discussions View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994152#3994152 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994152

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - entity map to sybase throw error

by zhoucw76321

jboss 4.5 sybase jdbc :version 6.5 jboss eclipse ide 3.1 persistence.xml <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <persistence-unit name="whhlega"> <jta-data-source>java:SYBASEDS</jta-data-source> </persistence-unit> deploy my project to jboss server will throw follow error message: Hibernate Dialect must be explicitly set for database: Adaptive Server could you tell me how to solve the problem ,if change the database example ms database ,is correct . View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994146#3994146 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994146

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Error in mapping at run-time.

by orfordi

Apologies, I think this is a user question. I'll go and ask elsewhere. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994142#3994142 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994142

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: URLSelectorStrategy

by weston.price＠jboss.com

This is actually slated for rework http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=91493 So, basically we want to move the HA stuff into the regular adapters and have it as a configuration option. And yes, there is quite a bit of useless duplicated code. By all means take a crack at it. It doesn't have to be perfect from the outset. I can take a look when you have something concrete. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994092#3994092 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994092

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Federated search

by julien＠jboss.com

Usability !!!!!! let's talk about it in one of our next discussions about that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994085#3994085 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994085

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: PortletInvoker interception refactoring

by julien＠jboss.com

Actually giving up on that until needed (use case is portlet security + wsrp integration) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994084#3994084 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994084

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Web Console: Componentizing

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

The task forms are in fact stored in the database as part of the process definition. The form content is included via a custom Facelets tag that includes the form content into the view. There's a few support components to allow the form buttons to work with the proper actions. The idea is that the user should be able to include task forms in their own application. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994065#3994065 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994065

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Web Console: Componentizing

by jonabbey

Ah, right you are. That makes perfect sense. I know this is a foolish question, but aren't the task forms held in the database? How is it that the forms are extracted and processed by JSF? Is there explicit code in the system which extracts the task forms and compiles JSF servlets from them? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994060#3994060 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994060

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Web Console: Componentizing

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

"jonabbey" wrote : Reasonable enough, I suppose, though it would seem that #2 and #3 could go together in one bundle. My fear with that is, I might want to remove or replace components in the #3 category as needed by the application. But #2 should be "stable" so that task forms can use future versions without fear of breakage. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3994055#3994055 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3994055

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2006