December 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Configuration - normalization

by mark.little＠jboss.com

I think you missed a smiley on that last sentence ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993808#3993808 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993808

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: JBossTS jar names

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

"mark.little(a)jboss.com" wrote : "bstansberry(a)jboss.com" wrote : Off topic, but since this thread looks to be the place where both Mark and I noticed the use of JBossTS in 4.2, I'll give Dimitris a quick FYI. | | | | This will break the Hibernate/JBC integration. See http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=97247. | | | | We were going to have to fix that pretty soon anyway, but the 4.2 timeline is definitely shorter. We can discuss that on the other forum topic. | | It's not necessarily off-topic. It shows that there are cross-project dependencies that still need to be ironed out. We were looking to do this for the AS 5 timeframe, which is far more realistic. Precisely. This specific issue is something we need to fix, but it is not on the JBC 1.4.1 roadmap. And trying to get this in place in time for AS 4.2 is pretty unrealistic. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993802#3993802 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993802

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JMS Provider(s) Design - JBossMQ/JBossMessaging/ActiveMQ

by daniel.brum＠jboss.com

That's a registry error. If you are using Oracle, did you setup the tables needed by juddi? You can find the sql under install/registry/sql i think. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993788#3993788 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993788

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: How to access UserModule on session timeout

by julien＠jboss.com

Look at org.jboss.portal.core.aspects.server.UserInterceptor View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993787#3993787 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993787

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Configuration - normalization

by tfennelly

"mark.little(a)jboss.com" wrote : But whatever happy medium you guys come up with, just make sure it's documented and in place yesterday ;-) hehehe I'm cool with whatever people find easiest to use - that's my goal (plus validation etc of course). I just think that the point at which we have it now is a good balance between having it humanly understandable and manageable, yet normalised enough to eliminate most problems caused by duplication. Of course, we can't tell until we get feedback from a broader range of people - I'm the only one that's really played with the current model while Kurt came up with the original - as the saying goes, "2 points don't make a curve". I personally would like to get some user feedback before bringing it any further. If then, we get a clear message asking for more normalisation, I'd be more than happy. Before we decided to make yesterdays forum post, this is actually what Kurt, Dave and I had agreed. I personally think that the extra normalisation is something that's easier to add than take away. Also, whatever option we take, do we really think we'll never have to come back to this again i.e. we're going to get it right first time? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993786#3993786 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993786

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Serialization Compatibility Tests

by pavel.tsekov＠redhat.com

Ok. I'll do it as per your suggestions. Now, a final question - where should I commit the test ? HEAD, Branch_JBossCache_1_4_0 or somewhere else. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993754#3993754 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993754

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - OSGi integration

by alesj

Regarding recent discussion with Ivelin about OSGi support in Microcontainer, what are our exact plans? As I see OSGi, there are two things to consider - implementation of framework (this what you started Scott, right) and basic services. Our first impression is that we'll be able to do this simply with the current deployers (vfs), metadata, dependency (kernel) and spring-int like xml binding. I'm about to go through the current v.4 specification, is there something I should consider more important? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993752#3993752 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993752

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: How to define ScanPeriod in Jboss5?

by vickyk

Because of this Hot Deployment is not working in Jboss5 Beta , i just check that . View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993746#3993746 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993746

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Configuration - normalization

by mark.little＠jboss.com

But whatever happy medium you guys come up with, just make sure it's documented and in place yesterday ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993744#3993744 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993744

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - JIRA issues from Neuchatel meeting

by alesj

I have created some JIRA tasks from the issues Adrian and me discussed in Neuchatel. Basically there are trivial / optional things. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993743#3993743 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993743

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2006