December 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Configuration - normalization

by mark.little＠jboss.com

Configuration duplication leads to errors. Can we take an approach that reduces that? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993531#3993531 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993531

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JMS Provider(s) Design - JBossMQ/JBossMessaging/ActiveMQ

by kurt.stam＠jboss.com

Thanks Jeff, By default we will ship using JBossMQ for the examples. However you can configure which JMS-provider you want to use on a per listener/gateway basis . We have also tested against ActiveMQ and MQ Series. See also: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/attachment/12313149/JMS-Provider-Config... Cheers, --Kurt View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993530#3993530 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993530

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Re: logging too verbose

by dimitris＠jboss.org

Is there any input on this? JBossTS 4.2.2 is configured in JBossAS 4.2, as well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993528#3993528 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993528

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JMS Provider(s) Design - JBossMQ/JBossMessaging/ActiveMQ

by jeffdelong

Oops, the XML snippets did not post: 1) Change the queue definitions in esb-quickstart-service.xml to use JBoss Messaging queues, e.g., | <server> | <loader-repository>jboss.messaging:loader=ScopedLoaderRepository | <loader-repository-config>java2ParentDelegation=false</loader-repository-config> | </loader-repository> | <mbean code="org.jboss.jms.server.destination.Queue" | name="jboss.messaging.destination:service=Queue,name=quickstart_helloworld_Request" | xmbean-dd="xmdesc/Queue-xmbean.xml"> | <depends optional-attribute-name="ServerPeer">jboss.messaging:service=ServerPeer</depends> | </mbean> | 2) Copied the jboss-messaging-client.jar to JBoss-4.0.5.GA/client and added the following to the helloworld_embedded_reg/build.xml classpath | <fileset dir="${jbosshome.dir}/server/ps/deploy/jboss-aop-jdk50.deployer"> | <include name="jboss-aop-jdk50.jar"/> | </fileset> | | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993524#3993524 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993524

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Configuration - normalization

by kurt.stam＠jboss.com

Oh and a server box goes around small service boxes and the connections go between those services. Sorry I mis-typed there. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993520#3993520 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993520

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JMS Provider(s) Design - JBossMQ/JBossMessaging/ActiveMQ

by jeffdelong

I tested the jbossesb-4.0RC1 HelloWorld quickstart with JBoss Messaging installed in JBoss-4.0.5. To get it to work I had to: 1) Change the queue definitions in esb-quickstart-service.xml to use JBoss Messaging queues, e.g., <loader-repository>jboss.messaging:loader=ScopedLoaderRepository <loader-repository-config>java2ParentDelegation=false</loader-repository-config> </loader-repository> <mbean code="org.jboss.jms.server.destination.Queue" name="jboss.messaging.destination:service=Queue,name=quickstart_helloworld_Request" xmbean-dd="xmdesc/Queue-xmbean.xml"> <depends optional-attribute-name="ServerPeer">jboss.messaging:service=ServerPeer 2) Copied the jboss-messaging-client.jar to JBoss-4.0.5.GA/client and added the following to the helloworld_embedded_reg/build.xml classpath Is the plan to release the ESB with examples that out-of-the-box use JBossMQ or JBoss Messaging? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993519#3993519 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993519

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Configuration - normalization

by kurt.stam＠jboss.com

When I read 'server' I see a box' when I read 'bus/channel' I see a line. I don't like to be bothered by the details :) and I certainly don't want to have those details in my file more then once :). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993518#3993518 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993518

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Configuration - normalization

by tfennelly

Kurt's brain and mine are very different I think :-) I wouldn't see the big OR small picture when the config becomes over fragmented with everything referencing everything else. You end up replacing duplication of the actual config parameters with duplication of reference ids all over your config, while not being able to see the wood from the trees :-) I'm looking forward to hearing what others think about this. In th mean time, I'm off home :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993516#3993516 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993516

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Configuration - normalization

by kurt.stam＠jboss.com

So to stay with the example - assuming the gateway and the listener use the same Queue, I would take this info and add it to the bus. And whatever is in the bus *now* I think should go in a server. :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993510#3993510 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993510

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Configuration - normalization

by kurt.stam＠jboss.com

So I think the point Tom is making is 'readability' of the configuration. And that the readabilty increases by not having to 'jump' through the file. We seem to agree that normalization by itself is a good thing :). So that said, I actually like to hide the details (pull out duplicate info) and give is human readable names. For example when I reference the jndi-* parameter I can care less. I'd rather see the servername like "jboss-4.0.4" or something. I guess my brain likes to see the big picture first.. I don't think tooling affects this, although tooling will be easier when the thing is fully normalized. --Kurt View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993506#3993506 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3993506

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2006