[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: JPDL Eclipse Graphical Editor - problem building.
by falazar
Hmm ok, it made it further this time
checkout.projects:
[mkdir] Created dir: /home/falazar/jbpm/CVS.jbpm.3/designer/jpdl/target/projects/docs
[cvs] Using cvs passfile: /home/falazar/.cvspass
[cvs] cvs [checkout aborted]: absolute pathname `/home/falazar/jbpm/CVS.jbpm.3/designer/jpdl/target/projects/docs' illegal for server
[mkdir] Created dir: /home/falazar/jbpm/CVS.jbpm.3/designer/jpdl/target/projects/org.jbpm.gd.jpdl.site
[cvs] Using cvs passfile: /home/falazar/.cvspass
[cvs] cvs [checkout aborted]: absolute pathname `/home/falazar/jbpm/CVS.jbpm.3/designer/jpdl/target/projects/org.jbpm.gd.jpdl.site' illegal for server
[mkdir] Created dir: /home/falazar/jbpm/CVS.jbpm.3/designer/jpdl/target/projects/build
[cvs] Using cvs passfile: /home/falazar/.cvspass
[cvs] cvs [checkout aborted]: absolute pathname `/home/falazar/jbpm/CVS.jbpm.3/designer/jpdl/target/projects/build' illegal for server
BUILD FAILED
/home/falazar/jbpm/CVS.jbpm.3/designer/jpdl/build.xml:32: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/home/falazar/jbpm/CVS.jbpm.3/designer/jpdl/build.xml:143: Basedir /home/falazar/jbpm/CVS.jbpm.3/designer/jpdl/target/projects/docs/gpd.userguide does not exist
Something with the CVS copying over?
James
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3958848#3958848
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3958848
19 years, 8 months
[Design of JBoss/Tomcat Integration] - Moving to a POJO configuration API
by scott.stark@jboss.org
We have been discussing updating tomcat6 to support the POJO style configuration that is needed for effective integration with the jboss5/mc based kernel. Let's use this thread for the status/discussion. As of now its still just an idea:
"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote :
| >
| > For now all I can say is that the parsing of the xml needs to produce
| > javabean metadata for which there is an api to configure both the
| > embedded tomcat instance as well as deployments. There should be no
| > feature of tomcmat we cannot set via a javabean api that does not
| > involve jmx or xml. Hopefully Bill can get the javaee5 injection stuff
| > done this week and then I can start working on porting this over to
| > the mc. Let's revisit this issue in a couple of weeks when I can state
| > where the configuration needs work.
| >
|
"mladen" wrote :
| OK. I already posted a mail on the Tomcat-dev to make something like that possible. So far I see no one objects to the proposal.
| Well, Remy is on the vacation :)
|
| So, I'll do my best to split the Tomcat6 to catalina-core.jar without JMX/SAX and cantalina.jar with the current API on top of catalina-core.jar
|
| Feel free to contact me for any problem.
| Seems we don't need a talk today then.
|
|
| Here the message thread about the subject from today:
|
| Yoav Shapira wrote:
| >> 3. What do you think that we split the Tomcat core
| >> from its configuration?
| >> The reason of the usage is very simple. First of all
| >> that additional package would be file system independent.
| >> It simply means that we would have a Tomcat with POJO
| >> API only, on top we could have any vitual-file-system
| >> abstraction there is. It can be a simple File, or as
| >> complex as email message.
| >
| > Intriguing idea that I think is worth exploring further.
| >
|
| I think this would give us a completely new POV.
| From the final product of view it would change nothing, but it would allow the embedder to provide the config from what ever content.
|
| The major thing is that we change the perspective from the configuration-centric to the application-centric, where the configuration would be requested, not provided.
|
| All that can be IMHO done in a very simple way, simply splitting the core from the SAX/JMX. Of course that split might introduce few extra cycles because of intermediate API, but who cares if the server will take 1 microsecond more to load?
|
| So, if we can do a catalina.jar on top of the catalina-core.jar one could use catalina-core without depending on the file system or JMX, without breaking anything.
|
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3958831#3958831
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3958831
19 years, 8 months