January 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Soap with Attachments and document/literal

by darran.lofthouse＠jboss.com

Forget that, that is the wrong WSDL extract. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4003039#4003039 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4003039

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Soap with Attachments and document/literal

by darran.lofthouse＠jboss.com

Related to my last post should we be able to support complex types that contain elements of type swaRef? Taking the following extract from my WSDL: - | <schema targetNamespace='http://www.jboss.org/support/photoalbum/types' | xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' | xmlns:soap11-enc='http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/' | xmlns:tns='http://www.jboss.org/support/photoalbum/types' | xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'> | <complexType name='Photo'> | <sequence> | <element name='caption' nillable='true' type='string'/> | <element name='image' nillable='true' type='string'/> | </sequence> | </complexType> | <element name='publishPhoto' type='tns:Photo'/> | <element name='publishPhotoResponse' type='int'/> | </schema> | </types> | | <message name='AlbumEndpoint_publishPhoto'> | <part element='ns1:publishPhoto' name='publishPhoto'/> | <part name='mimepart' type='xsd:hexBinary'/> | </message> If swaRef is supported I would have though that mapping the attachment to a parameter on the SEI should be mandatory as in this case the swaRef can reference the attachment instead. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4003036#4003036 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4003036

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Plan to improve CMS integration

by julien＠jboss.com

It is fixed. Actually it was the fact that the User/CMS security integration was not enabled (I was planning to do that tonight according to my migration plan). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4003030#4003030 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4003030

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Can't deploy processdefinition from GPD into jBPM 3.2 -

by jeffdelong

Actually, I see that the jbpm-console.war that is inside the jbpm-enterprise ear is different and DOES NOT contain the hibernate and jbpm.cfg.xml files. So I think the problem is the CMT vs JTA, and will make this change and re-test. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4003025#4003025 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4003025

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Can't deploy processdefinition from GPD into jBPM 3.2 -

by jeffdelong

Also, I don't think the console should use the Command interface at this point in the 3.2 lifecycle. I don't think the Command interface has been tested thoroughly, and though it's meant to be extensible, you might wind up have to create several new commands to do what you need (which could be time consuming). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4003022#4003022 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4003022

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Can't deploy processdefinition from GPD into jBPM 3.2 -

by jeffdelong

So what you need to do to make it configurable is in two files: 1) hibernate.cfg.xml needs to be transaction enabled - see the one in jbpm-configs (or perhaps remove your copy from classes when deployed as part of the ear ? will you find it on the application classpath - I think so?) By the way, I think this file should use JTA not CMT. CMT assume the container has always started a transaction, and hibernate will never attempt to. If JTA, then hibernate will start one if none exists. If you are not using the CommandInterface, you need Hibernate to start one. 2) jbpm.cfg.xml - need to specify isTransactionEnabled to false. Again see the one in jbpm-configs. I will remove the versions of these files from the web-console.war, change CMT to JTA, and see if the correct ones are picked up. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4003021#4003021 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4003021

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Can't deploy processdefinition from GPD into jBPM 3.2 -

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

Looking around *yet more*, it looks like there is at least a partial command api in there... I dunno, I guess I'll do whatever you'd like :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4003020#4003020 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4003020

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Can't deploy processdefinition from GPD into jBPM 3.2 -

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

Amendment: I should say, I wouldn't want to put this kind of implementation inside of the web application. If you think the jbpm core api should have a (replacement or supplemental) command pattern-based interface, that would work. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4003018#4003018 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4003018

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Can't deploy processdefinition from GPD into jBPM 3.2 -

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

What benefit does using an ejb for this purpose provide, apart from transaction management? I think making transaction handling configurable is more appropriate. The web application should be able to use the jbpm api without adding a layer of abstraction upon it. The only difference in an enterprise environment should be how jbpm manages the transaction internally. In the standalone case it would use hibernate directly (for example); in the enterprise case it would use JTA to locate/create and manage the transaction. But it should all happen behind the scenes; the jbpm txn management api should handle this transparently. I'm not sure I like the idea of redoing the web application actions in terms of the command pattern, because I wouldn't expect users to have to think in those terms; in many ways this application is a definitive jbpm example application. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4003017#4003017 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4003017

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: JMS Example in 3.2 Beta

by jeffdelong

The problem here is that the second command (SignalCommand) needs the tokenId created from executing the first command (NewProcessInstanceCommand). Another approach would be to hace the NewProcessInstanceCommand signal when there are no start tasks. It is hard to imagine any other situation where the user would want to create a processInstance and not signal it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4003002#4003002 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4003002

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2007