January 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Tracing what happens before EARDeployer starts

by SmokingAPipe

I'm new to JBoss internals. I'm having a very strange problem: I have two applications in EAR files. When I deploy them on my desktop machine here (localhost) I get normal log messages. When I set up a virtual-host entry in jboss-web.xml, and the corresponding Host entries in jbossweb/server.xml, I get no log messages, or System.out, or anything from the web apps. In a normal situation, the first log message I see is the EARDeployer message. When it is on the real server with virtual hosts, the EARs do in fact deploy, but there is no EARDeployer message on console, or any other message from these EARs, no matter what logging method I use, even System.out.println(). Of course exceptions don't show up, so this whole system is almost useless in production because I can only guess at where problems are. I have spent about three days working on this and am not getting anywyere. My next step is to go through the JBoss source code to figure out where these log messages are being dropped. It looks like EARDeployer is the first thing that's missing so maybe I should start there. Can anyone suggest how I get started in the JBoss source to trace this? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002479#4002479 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002479

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Bean definition as value add problem (JBMICROCONT-28)

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

So did we end up supporting this anonymous inner bean syntax? Its a bit tedious to have to reference another bean when the bean really is a contained entity with a lifecycle bound to the bean into which its being injected. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002474#4002474 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002474

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - shutdown vs. undeploy with serialized attachments

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

Does the kernel make a distinction between undeploy and shutdown with serialized attachments? IMO, undeploy deletes the DeploymentContext's serialized attachments, while shutdown does not. We really need this distinction for unit testing where the same jar name might be deployed numerous times and yet be entirely different internally. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002468#4002468 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002468

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: SerializableDeploymentRepository notions

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

That really should be an optional development type feature where a vfs visitor provides the deployment timestamp. If the visitor is configured then edits made outside of the profile service can be identified. The simplest initial implementation is to simply touch the top level deployment anytime content is changed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002464#4002464 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002464

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: SerializableDeploymentRepository notions

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

Don't see how the current logic could work with exploded archive. You have the "WATCH FILE" problem all over again. A deploymentContext could have a number of attachments associated with it that are loaded from different deployers and multiple files. One attachment could even be loaded from multiple files. This logic is going to need callbacks to the deployer that needs the attachment so that the deployer can identify timestamps to check the serialization event against. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002462#4002462 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002462

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Fine grained action aware interfaces (JBMICROCONT-134)

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I pulled in your changes and will test them in my local snapshot update. I'll be pushing out a new snapshot tonight that includes these along with management changes I'm working on. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002456#4002456 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002456

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Running with the full featured profile service

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : "charles.crouch(a)jboss.com" wrote : "scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : CNFE are expected and prevent updates from loading. | | | | So the testAddDataSource is expected to fail? What needs to be in place for it to succeed? | | | No, that works for me. | Ok, I was lying. A previous simple deployment creation was working, but applying changes to the template properties as is currently done in the test is not. This should be working by tonight's checkin. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002448#4002448 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002448

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: SerializableDeploymentRepository notions

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

If that happens then the pre-processed attachments need to be thrown away. This is a check that needs to be added to the loadAttachments logic. If a raw deployment is newer than the attachments the are thrown away. Now if there are also admin edits, whether or not they can be reapplied will depend on the change and how the edits are stored. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002446#4002446 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002446

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - CMS "Select Action" DropDown broken in IE6

by kbjorndahl

Works good in FireFox, but the drop down doesn't see to drop down in IE6 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002445#4002445 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002445

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - ManagedProperty changes

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Two changes I need to allow for better use of ManagedProperty are to change the ManagedPropertyImpl managedObject field to be of type ManagedObject rather than ManagedObjectImpl (this is done and in the current snapshot), and also to allow a ManagedProperty to be disconnected from its ManagedObject as in not requiring this to be non-null. This is needed for deployment templates that just want to expose a set of properties that need to be applied to a template. The ManagedProperty are simple value type objects used to convey the required properties in order to populate the template. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4002444#4002444 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4002444

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2007