January 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Javassist development Forum] - Re: insertBefore and replacing support for throw.

by eliotmoss

I think what you'd need is an ExprEditor for athrow bytecodes. If done at that level, the exception object will already have been constructed, but not yet thrown. Presumably you could modify or replace it, or do something else. But you'd need either to return from the method or throw something that it either handles locally or that is legal to throw from the method. Easiest and safest might be to restrict it either to return (a type-safe value) or throw an object of the original exception class. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4000254#4000254 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4000254

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Javassist development Forum] - Re: Array access

by eliotmoss

I have implemented an Editor for the array fetch and store bytescodes. There is one, possibly significant, limitation at present. For object arrays, it does not know the type. The reason is that this is not trivially apparent from the bytecodes (unlike calls, for example, where you a signature, and fields give their declared type). I have begun writing the code necessary to propagate type information (similar to what is needed in a bytecode verifier, but limited just to this purpose), but won't have the chance to finish it for a while. Note that this just intercepts every usage at a particular code point. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4000251#4000251 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4000251

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Using jbossws/trunk for jboss-5.0, jboss-4.2, jboss-4.0.

by jason.greene＠jboss.com

It's failing because of a known Xerces bug: http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBWSFAQXercesNPE View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4000250#4000250 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4000250

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: What is the base entry point for aop remoting?

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

It could be easily created and is something I want to do anyways for JNDI refactoring when I get to it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4000219#4000219 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4000219

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Whats the easiest way to access JBPM data outside of the

by prassib

so I figured out that jbpm-3.1.1.jar has turned on the lazy initialization in all the hibernate configs. In the old jbpm-3.0.4.jar, the lazy initialization was false in most of the hibernate configs. I updated the HBM configs & created my modified version of jbpm-3.1.1.jar & now my DAO can successfully fetch data from the JBPM database. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4000200#4000200 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4000200

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: bean/mbean integration issue

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

The remoting connector could not simply be ported to a mc bean as it does not support its configuration as a pojo. The workaround I came up with was to introduce an mc bean proxy for the connector mbean using factoryClass attribute and the existing org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanTyper factory type class: | <bean name="ConnectorMBean"> |  | <constructor factoryClass="org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanTyper" factoryMethod="typeMBean"> | <parameter><inject bean="JMXKernel" property="mbeanServer"/></parameter> | <parameter>jboss.remoting:service=Connector,transport=socket</parameter> | <parameter>org.jboss.remoting.transport.ConnectorMBean</parameter> | </constructor> | </bean> |  | <bean name="ProfileServiceInvocationHandler" | class="org.jboss.aspects.remoting.AOPRemotingInvocationHandler"> | <install bean="ConnectorMBean" method="addInvocationHandler"> | <parameter>ProfileService</parameter> | <parameter><this/></parameter> | </install> | <uninstall bean="ConnectorMBean" method="removeInvocationHandler"> | <parameter>ProfileService</parameter> | </uninstall> | </bean> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4000198#4000198 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4000198

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: What is the base entry point for aop remoting?

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

No AFAIK. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4000191#4000191 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4000191

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Retrowoven container project

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

A few of the JDK 1.4 tests in AOP are failing due to java.lang.reflect.ParameterizedType being used by the container project. while not supported in JBoss Retro. I tried adding that to Retro, but it now falls over on things like: java.lang.reflect.Constructor.getGenericParameterTypes()[Lorg/jboss/lang/reflect/Type; java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.reflect.Constructor.getGenericParameterTypes()[Lorg/jboss/lang/reflect/Type; at org.jboss.reflect.plugins.introspection.IntrospectionTypeInfoFactoryImpl.getConstructors(IntrospectionTypeInfoFactoryImpl.java:143) at org.jboss.reflect.plugins.ClassInfoImpl.getDeclaredConstructors(ClassInfoImpl.java:400) at org.jboss.beans.info.plugins.AbstractBeanInfoFactory.getConstructors(AbstractBeanInfoFactory.java:177) at org.jboss.beans.info.plugins.AbstractBeanInfoFactory.getBeanInfo(AbstractBeanInfoFactory.java:138) at org.jboss.config.plugins.AbstractConfiguration.getBeanInfo(AbstractConfiguration.java:75) at org.jboss.test.beaninfo.test.AbstractBeanInfoTest.getBeanInfo(AbstractBeanInfoTest.java:349) at org.jboss.test.beaninfo.test.BeanInfoUnitTestCase.testBean(BeanInfoUnitTestCase.java:153) at org.jboss.test.beaninfo.test.BeanInfoUnitTestCase.testBeanConstructors(BeanInfoUnitTestCase.java:73) at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:22) at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:19) at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:23) So support for this needs implementing View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4000190#4000190 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4000190

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: org.jboss.aop.Dispatcher error?

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

Thanks, I've fixed this View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4000189#4000189 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4000189

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - 2.6 alpha release

by julien＠jboss.com

I worked today to cleanup tests for the 2.6 release : - I had to fix the CMS tests that were not able to run because it was relying on the UserModule from JNDI which was not available in the test environment. I fixed it by making the IdentityServiceController injected in the JCRCMS service instead - commented out the 2 portlet test cases that cannot technically pass - commented out one theme test that does not seem to exist anymore - fixed the portal object and instance test cases that were broken due to my refactorings (I had to update the jboss-aop.xml and change the pointcuts, I can't wait to have Java 5 and annotations...) - I updated the test framework to handle multi node testing (that was disabled after the refactorings done to handle test parameterization). - I ported the 2.4 slight changes to portlet session replication to trunk. All tests in the testsuite are passing for me now. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4000184#4000184 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4000184

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2007