January 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Plan to improve CMS integration

by julien＠jboss.com

Another objective is to allow to split the core module into several sub modules (base services / UI / CMS integration) in order to increase the flexibility and ease the development made on that module. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999520#3999520 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999520

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: new simplified menu structure

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

changing the db schema to split the jbpm_processdefinition table in 2 is too complicated, i think. but we could add a column ISLATEST_ to the process definition table that we maintain manually during deployment. is that a good idea ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999519#3999519 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999519

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: replace separate managers task list view with generic se

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

i would leave fine grained authorization out of the current 3.2 release and postpone it to one of the later releases. this requires special care as that might make it much harder to rip out the default jbpm identity component. great care has to be taken with the defaults so that the authorization is natural, but not fine grained if you replace or remove your identity component. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999517#3999517 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999517

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: free choice of initial node

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-820 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999514#3999514 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999514

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: one central search page

by jeffdelong

I prefer ProcessInstances over Executions. Not only more understandable to the user, but consistent with the jBPM object model / API. In general I would try not to re-invent terms if jBPM already has a good term for something. ProcessDefinitions and ProcessInstances are not only jBPM terms, but are pretty much "industry standard" (as much as there are standards in the BPM market). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999512#3999512 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999512

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Plan to improve CMS integration

by julien＠jboss.com

In order to improve the CMS integration on the following points : 1/ more decouple the CMS from the portal 2/ improve the integration of content into portal pages We should handle content at the portal object level. Today a portal window is implicitely a window that points to a portlet. It is possible to make the Window agnostic of portlets and introduce to sub interfaces PortletWindow and ContentWindow. PortletWindow would contain the String reference to the portlet instance and ContentWindow would contain an URI that would point to the CMS content. This way admins would not have to configure the CMS portlet that points to the appropriate content. I would like to perform that change for the beta release. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999509#3999509 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999509

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Bug in transactional delivery in an MDB

by timfox

"weston.price(a)jboss.com" wrote : In the latest version of the adapter (HEAD), the non-transactional context is handled by the JCA adapter using Local JMS transactions Ok good, this is what I would expect, and is consistent with how transactional message delivery with MDBs works (convertion of work done outside the global tx into work done inside the global tx). This means the behaviour expected in http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-410 is not going to happen in HEAD anyway. So I think we are safe to revert the changes in JBMESSAGING-410 and I can get the patch out ASAP. Everyone agreed? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999506#3999506 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999506

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Bug in transactional delivery in an MDB

by weston.price＠jboss.com

In the latest version of the adapter (HEAD), the non-transactional context is handled by the JCA adapter using Local JMS transactions which was added to support the case where a Bean managed or CMT Not Supported MDB throws a Runtime Exception. Here the JMS and EJB specs differ as to how this should be treated. We had a long thread about this awhile ago when we were trying to address issues with the JBoss beta we were trying to get out the door. Unfortunately, for this case (and many others) there is no 'correct' behavior as the spec is silent in this regard. Note the behavior in HEAD is a complete rewrite from the way we originally handled this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999503#3999503 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999503

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: user based process versioning ?

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

"tom.baeyens(a)jboss.com" wrote : david, i don't yet see the point of having a table separation for process definition versions and process definitions. now there is only a process definition version table and the name and version are columns. Yes, which means that in order to determine the latest version of a process, the generated SQL must select all rows for a process to know what the latest version is. If we have a separate version table, then only one row from each table need be selected to determine the latest version. This is just one benefit of having normalized database tables. All the tables in jBPM should be normalized unless there is a very good reason not to (which there usually isn't). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999502#3999502 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999502

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Redelivery caused by System.exit()? urgent!!!!

by timfox

longfangq- A word of advice: If you want someone to look at your issue, then a) posting in the wrong forum b) posting multiple times and c) "urgent!!!!" is not the best way to go about it. Heed my words, there are much grumpier people than me lurking around ;) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999490#3999490 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3999490

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2007