October 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Weird SimpleValueSupport instance

by alesj

We could add | value = typeInfo.convert(value) | right after we fully determine typeInfo to either DefaultMetaValueFactory or just to ServiceMetaDataICF. Just tested addition to DefaultMetaValueFactory and the tests pass. OK to commit it there? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093963#4093963 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093963

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Compatability of jBPM with weblogic portal

by Nimish

Hi, My existing application which has a number of transactions developed using weblogic portal and is deployed in an clusted weblogic environment. Now my new requirements need me to develop process flow using the above transactions. One traditional approach is to develop java code to monitor state and objects from database and control the transactions. I am trying to understand if jBPM can give me a cleaner and flexible solution to define my flows reusing the existing transactions. Please help with your inputs on the following criteria's: - 1. Compatability issues or insights of using jBPM along with weblogic. 2. Best practices of using transaction developed on weblogic portal into process defination of JBPM as tasks. thanks, Nimish View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093955#4093955 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093955

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: When will W3CEndpointReference instance construction be

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWS-1844 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093891#4093891 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093891

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of the JBoss EJB Container] - Calling EJB from C++ Client

by lovin_v

Hi All, I would like to know the following (1) Can we make TCP socket connections to the JBoss Application server? As far as I know the connections with application server should be RMI/IIOP. We need to investigate if the C++ client can directly connect to the session beans without going through the IIOP. (2) Can the TCP connections to the server be load balanced and configured for seamless failover to other servers in the cluster? Regards, Lovin.V View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093840#4093840 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093840

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Exception propagation using HTTP servlet transport on 1.

by ron.sigal＠jboss.com

Hi David, A fix for JBREM-813 "ServletServerInvoker should return an exception instead of just an error message" (http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-813) is now available in Remoting release 2.2.2.SP2, which may be downloaded from the repository: http://repository.jboss.com/jboss/remoting/. Note that to obtain the desired behavior, it is necessary to configure the Connector with the parameter "return-exception" set to "true". View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093791#4093791 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093791

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: SchemaBindingResolver.resolve based on ns to class

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

That is what I added. | <bean name="WarSchemaResolverConfig" | class="org.jboss.xb.binding.sunday.unmarshalling.SchemaResolverConfig"> |  | <property name="bindingClassesByLocations"> | <map keyClass="java.lang.String" valueClass="java.lang.String"> | <entry> | <key>http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd</key> | <value>org.jboss.metadata.web.spec.Web23MetaData</value> | </entry> | </map> | </property> | </bean> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093774#4093774 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093774

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: SchemaBindingResolver.resolve based on ns to class

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

If there is a possibility to map a namespace to different XSDs then it's possible that those XSDs define global types/elements under the same name. In theory at least, merging them into one schema may result in conflicts. Therefore, I would vote for <schemaLocation,class> pair. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093739#4093739 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093739

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - SchemaBindingResolver.resolve based on ns to class

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

The current logic of being able to register a namespace to class mapping does not work for families of descriptors like javaee that reuse the same namespace across all of the descriptors. The only indication of a difference as the time resolution is done is the optional schemaLocation information: | <web-app xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee" | xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd" | version="2.4"> | | <ejb-jar xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee" | xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/ejb-jar_2_1.xsd" | version="2.1"> | | Either the schemaLocation needs to be looked at, and a schemaLocation,class pair used to register a class, or we allow multiple class bindings for a namespace to create an uber SchemaBinding with multiple root elements. The latter seems like it would work, but I have not looked into it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093705#4093705 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093705

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: CachePolicy in JaasSecurityManagerService

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

Ok got it. Inheritance from Dan and team. I will request Stefan (who brought this issue up originally) to do the FQN way to add clustered cache policy is an user requires. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093702#4093702 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093702

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: CachePolicy in JaasSecurityManagerService

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Injection meant a shot at the doctor 5 years ago when this was created. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093700#4093700 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093700

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums October 2007