October 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: @XmlElementWrapper/@XmlElements

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

This is how it is supposed to work http://java.sun.com/javaee/5/docs/api/javax/xml/bind/annotation/XmlElemen... There supposed to be only one bar element wrapping the XmlElements. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093449#4093449 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093449

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: When will W3CEndpointReference instance construction be

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

This is due to lack of demand and probably not a great deal to implement. Could you please create a feature request in jira that we can then link to this thread and schedule accordingly? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093438#4093438 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093438

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Deadlock in JBoss Messaging during JBoss5 shutdown

by timfox

I am not having any luck in replicating this. Using current AS TRUNK I have deploying and undeploying various ejb3 MDBs with valid and invalid destinations, and starting and stopping the server several times, but have not observed a deadlock. Anil- you mentioned you could replicate this. Please can give you give instructions on how to do so? Thx View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093430#4093430 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093430

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: When will W3CEndpointReference instance construction be

by jhalliday

Hi Thomas This looks like it could be a blocker for putting transactions onto the JBossWS native stack, which in turn makes it a blocker for the transactions release we are going to use in AS 5.0 GA In short, I'd appreciate it if your team could schedule this in to your roadmap sooner rather than later. Do you anticipate it will require significant effort or is it unscheduled just due to lack of demand? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093393#4093393 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093393

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: When will W3CEndpointReference instance construction be

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

No, not yet View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093381#4093381 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093381

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - When will W3CEndpointReference instance construction be avai

by adinn

The current implementations of createW3CEndpointReference() etc in javax.xml.ws.spi.Provider all throw a NotImplementedException. is there a target date/release for implementation of W3CEndpointreference construction? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093372#4093372 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093372

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: The default local interface (vs. EJBTHREE-785)

by wolfc

"bill.burke(a)jboss.com" wrote : | The spec says nothing about inheritance of interfaces. "EJB 3 4.6.2" wrote : The session bean class may have superclasses and/or superinterfaces. If the session bean has superclasses, the business methods, lifecycle callback interceptor methods, the timeout callback method, the methods of the optional SessionSynchronization interface, the Init or ejbCreate methods, the Remove methods, and the methods of the SessionBean interface, may be de?ned in the session bean class, or in any of its superclasses. A session bean class must not have a superclass that is itself a session bean class. | Combined with 4.6.6 doesn't really allow for business interfaces to be defined by a superclass, but the water gets real murky. So I let EJBTHREE-785 pass. "bill.burke(a)jboss.com" wrote : | Nope, just read EJBTHREE_785. What Gavin wants is this: | | | | public class MyBean implements MyRemote {} | | | | @Stateless | | public class SubBean extends MyBean {} | | | Business interface of SubBean has a remote interface of MyRemote. | That's exactly what is working. It's EJBTHREE-1062 that has stopped working and the first scenario I sketched is an expectancy problem. So we need to choice either option A or B. I like A in the sense that it's closer to the spec and thus easier on the TCK. I like B because it is more closely aligned with EJBTHREE-785. It all depends on what you would expect to happen in the 'outside the box' scenarios. I need a definitive statement to bring it into the box. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093359#4093359 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093359

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Added dtd public/system id info to SchemaBinding

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I added a hack to propagate dtd system and public id information to the root object in a SchemaBinding if a dtd was seen, and the root object supports a method signature of: | public void setDTD(String root, String publicId, String systemId) | The ee 1.3 dtd based metadata in jboss-metadata is using this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093245#4093245 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093245

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [sim] language features

by kukeltje

Bernd, A time-duration with configurable variation (relative to the timescale) would also be a nice option for actions/scripts. So they do not run, but still contribute to the dirstribution of load, resources etc. For the rest, I'd say lets just see where this takes us... Besides that, would be nice to display the result of a sim from the database in something like www.pentaho.org View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093230#4093230 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093230

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [sim] language features

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

i'll try to have a look at the proposal asap. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4093218#4093218 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4093218

18 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums October 2007