November 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: ManagedObject support in next messaging release

by dimitris＠jboss.org

Ok, I'll use that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4103070#4103070 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4103070

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: re: Feedback requested on throttling ejb calls

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

It could, but you then need to specify every single pointcut manually, i.e. you would not be able to use the annotations in the bindings View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4103069#4103069 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4103069

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Finalize 2.0.0 api

by alesj

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-216 | As you could see, I closed this one, since it's a duplicate of http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-215. "scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : Let's do a review and get the old stuff out. | How do we spot the old stuff? :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4103067#4103067 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4103067

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: ManagedObject support in next messaging release

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Currently the annotation is just metadata. The service mbean container has no integration with the aop layer. Its just extra metadata. There is a future jira issue to rewrite the xmbean container to have its interceptors be proper aop aspects. http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1701 For the ServiceMetaDataICF issue, it just needs to ServiceMetaData/ServiceAnnotationMetaData to see if there is another class that should be used for the managed object view. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4103058#4103058 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4103058

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: re: Feedback requested on throttling ejb calls

by ScottMarlowNovell

Would this work? Have a SemaphoreAspectFactory instance for each named semaphore definition and create the semaphoreAspect from the factory. Something like: | <aspect name="ThrottleReadMostlyAspect" factory="org.jboss.aspects.concurrent.SemaphoreAspectFactory" scope="PER_JVM"> | <attribute name="permits">48</attribute> | </aspect> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4103051#4103051 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4103051

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Finalize 2.0.0 api

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

We need a review of the mc apis to finalize these for the 2.0.0.CR1 release. Still some obsolete api that should be dropped, for example the DeploymentUnit.getTypes call. http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-216 Let's do a review and get the old stuff out. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4103048#4103048 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4103048

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBAS-3969 issue

by alesj

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : Ales, how are you running the test? | Starting 'run -c all' + 'testsuite/build -Dtest=deployers test. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4103038#4103038 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4103038

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBAS-3969 issue

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Ales, how are you running the test? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4103035#4103035 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4103035

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: re: Feedback requested on throttling ejb calls

by ScottMarlowNovell

Yes, I meant the scope when you declare the aspect. Yes, a group or "named semaphore" attribute would be ideal. I'm thinking that we need a way to configure the "named semaphore" but I'm not sure what that should look like. The configuration would specify the number of Semaphore permits and the name. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4103026#4103026 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4103026

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: re: Feedback requested on throttling ejb calls

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

Yes, if I understand you correctly. Are you talking about the scope when you declare the aspect? Although, this scope is quite course-grained. PER_VM - all share the same semaphore PER_CLASS - all instances of a class share the same semaphore PER_INSTANCE - each instance has the same semaphore etc. It might be worth allowing for an extra attribute on the annotations to declare a "group" or something to choose the semaphores? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4103018#4103018 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4103018

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2007