December 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Contents of the SOAP request

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | can only be achieved editing the jbossws configurations in standard-jaxws-client-config.xml. | you can also supply your own config file View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4113810#4113810 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4113810

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Message delivery starts before endpoint is ready

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | I think the most straightforward solution here is to put the described workaround (the sleep) in the abstract JMSTransportSupport class | yes View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4113807#4113807 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4113807

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: ws-security code

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

What specific functionality that is not already available in xmlsec.jar are you interested in? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4113805#4113805 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4113805

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: jUDDI tables dropped at server shutdown

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | I would prefer fixing EAP's juddi. | Yes, and its not really a question of preference. The juddi-service needs to get updated and verified against the TCK. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4113801#4113801 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4113801

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: WSDLtoJava multiple Namespace to multiple package mappin

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

I think the explicit package mapping should be optional and default to the behavior that is already in place View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4113799#4113799 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4113799

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: metadata

by wolfc

We need a runtime model of meta data, not just the meta data itself. I don't want to parse or load / analyze classes just to use a piece of meta data. So annotations represent our runtime model. I also don't want to have a strong dependency on the container to write up new functionality. So if I want a @ReturnNonNull piece of 'meta data' and have an interceptor check that as a post condition on a method's return value, then I don't want to modify the container for that. So in the end I think we'll have the getAnnotation methods. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4113775#4113775 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4113775

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Tools (dev)] - Re: Solve AWT problem using JBossTools Release 2.0 on Mac OS

by max.andersen＠jboss.com

btw. http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1376 is our jira for it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4113749#4113749 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4113749

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Tools (dev)] - Re: Solve AWT problem using JBossTools Release 2.0 on Mac OS

by max.andersen＠jboss.com

any official eclipse bug for this one? looks weird that disabling awt should make it work... But thanks for the tip though! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4113746#4113746 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4113746

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Tools (dev)] - Solve AWT problem using JBossTools Release 2.0 on Mac OS X 1

by sisepago

Problem: After creating a seam project, open the ".xhtml" made problem: Unhandled event loop exception Can't start the AWT because Java was started on the first thread. Make sure StartOnFirstThread is not specified in your application's Info.plist or on the command line Solution: edit your eclipse.ini ####### eclipse/Eclipse.app/Contents/MacOs/eclipse.ini #################### | | -showsplash | org.eclipse.platform | -vmargs | -Xdock:icon=../Resources/Eclipse.icns | -XstartOnFirstThread | -Xms40m | -Xmx512m | -XX:MaxPermSize=256m | -Dosgi.requiredJavaVersion=1.5 | -Dorg.eclipse.swt.internal.carbon.smallFonts remove the -XstartOnFirstThread and set this -Djava.awt.headless=true ####### eclipse/Eclipse.app/Contents/MacOs/eclipse.ini #################### | -showsplash | org.eclipse.platform | -vmargs | -Xdock:icon=../Resources/Eclipse.icns | -Djava.awt.headless=true | -Xms40m | -Xmx512m | -XX:MaxPermSize=256m | -Dosgi.requiredJavaVersion=1.5 | -Dorg.eclipse.swt.internal.carbon.smallFonts and then restart your eclipse View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4113729#4113729 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4113729

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: bam, the next frontier

by andyredhead

I think getting "BAM" functionality into jBPM would be excellent. In the past, I've ended up using database views over the jbpm tables to provide a picture of how many process instances are in which state (and how long they've been there). One thing that I think is missing from the current discussion is the idea of the "owner" of a process instance. If you know who owns a process instance it becomes easy to do queries like "show me the current state of all the process instances I own with a task that is past its due date" - which is very useful for people who are trying to manage the overall business process. I'd also caution against assuming that historical "BI" functionality has to be included with BAM. It is my experience that for "busy" systems, BI reporting is carried out against a dedicated reporting database, so that complex and slow running queries do not "clog" the business critical transactional database. The BI reporting will be performed over a large set of data, not just data captured by jBPM (it may pull in data from other sources as well, such as webserver logs) - which means the whole BI piece goes beyond the scope of jBPM... ? Cheers, Andy View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4113720#4113720 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4113720

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2007