December 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: ProcessInstance vs. Execution

by brittm

Thanks Ronald. Now I have another forum I have to read from the beginning. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4113012#4113012 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4113012

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: ant tests-jacc-security

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

On my 2 dual core Fedora 7 box -- only pasting AuditUnitTestCase, as you told me on IM that that was what's important: | tests-jacc-security: | [echo] creating jacc config | [copy] Copying 197 files to /home/bes/dev/jboss/clean/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.Beta3/server/jacc | [echo] Overwriting config descriptors | [copy] Copying 5 files to /home/bes/dev/jboss/clean/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.Beta3/server/jacc | [server:start] Starting server "jacc" with command: | [server:start] /usr/java/jdk1.5.0_12/bin/java -cp /home/bes/dev/jboss/clean/trunk/build/output/jboss-5.0.0.Beta3/bin/run.jar:/usr/java/default/lib/tools.jar -Xmx256m -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true org.jboss.Main -c jacc -b 192.168.1.145 | [echo] Starting patternset=jacc.includes config=JACC | [junit] Running org.jboss.test.cmp2.audit.test.AuditUnitTestCase | [junit] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 11.114 sec | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4113009#4113009 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4113009

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - JMS Endpoint - Message delivery starts before endpoint is re

by alessio.soldano＠jboss.com

I'm taking a look at the http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBWS-1324 issue; here are some thoughts about it we might want to discuss: - It's difficult to systematically reproduce this issue in a testcase; Darran, do you already have a testcase showing this behaviour? - Apart from this, I think the most straightforward solution here is to put the described workaround (the sleep) in the abstract JMSTransportSupport class, preventing the user from doing the same in every JMS endpoints. - Ideally it would be great to have these MDBs deployed with the message delivery disabled and enable it once the DefaultEndpoint is ready (let's say from a deployment aspect for example). However the only way I see to have a MDB deployed this way is to use the DeliveryActive attribute in the standard jboss bean configuration (invoker-proxy-binding -> proxy-factory-config -> MDBConfig). Moreover afaik this cannot be done with EJB3s (and I think soon we'll need them too). - Another workaround could be to have the message driven bean depend on something being deployed after it in the same sar archive (a queue for example), like in our org.jboss.test.ws.jaxrpc.samples.jmstransport sample. As far as I can see trying the sample, our endoint state goes to STARTED in the deployment start phase of the jar, when the EndpointLifecycleDeploymentAspect:Start is called. At that point the ejb service is waiting on the start of the queue specified in the sar archive, since the inner jar is deployed first. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112970#4112970 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112970

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - JBoss Portal 2.6.3 released

by thomas.heute＠jboss.com

We just released JBoss Portal 2.6.3, grab it while it's hot. As usual now, the release note is available on our blog: http://blog.jboss-portal.org/2007/12/jboss-portal-263-released.html Thanks to everyone who contributed ! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112948#4112948 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112948

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: New state transfer in JBoss Cache

by bela＠jboss.com

I'll take a look. Manik, have you thought about an iterative approach to transferring state ? E.g. a low-level, low-priority task on the state provider which iterates over the tree a few times and sends the state to new joiner in small slices, and is only active when there isn't much load on the tree ? IMO a number of applications could live with such a state transfer, e.g. active-passive configs View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112943#4112943 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112943

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Seam examples tests

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

"wolfc" wrote : And thus we'll have a circular dependency when Seam goes into EAP. Because currently EAP == AS instead of icing on top. I don't quite see how? This is just some ear artifacts that are downloaded and deployed by the testsuite. Seam isn't embedded into EAP or AS5, just provided as a user library. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112933#4112933 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112933

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Seam examples tests

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

Ok, I have comitted seam.xml - sorry for the delay :( Currently it loads the seam numberguess, booking and dvdstore examples from Seam 2.0.1.CR1. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112931#4112931 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112931

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: ant tests-jacc-security

by mmoyses

I'm also running in a 64 bit environment. | [mmoyses@mmoyses ~]$ uname -a | Linux mmoyses 2.6.23.8-63.fc8 #1 SMP Wed Nov 21 17:56:40 EST 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux | [mmoyses@mmoyses ~]$ java -version | java version "1.5.0_14" | Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_14-b03) | Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.5.0_14-b03, mixed mode) | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112894#4112894 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112894

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: ProcessInstance vs. Execution

by kukeltje

http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=109359 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112874#4112874 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112874

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: ProcessInstance vs. Execution

by kukeltje

Britt, It will not change for jBPM 3.3. The discussion about this is being held in the pvm forum. So if it changes, it changes for jBPM 4.0. Might be that some (all?) backwardscompatibility will be available. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112873#4112873 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112873

18 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2007