February 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: [O/T] Bug/issue triage

by estaub

Tom, My concern is more that I can't even see the present, not that I can't see the future. I think you've resolved a lot of issues that aren't marked as resolved in Jira. Is that true? If so, could you mark them as resolved? I think there are issues that are targetted for 3.2 that you are sure won't be resolved in 3.2. Is that true? If so, could you take them off of 3.2 in Jira? I know that 16-Feb is not the 3.2 release date. While I understand the difficulty of holding to release dates, I'm sure that you have a better guesstimate in your mind than 16-Feb. Can you put it on the Jira? I'm not asking for hour-by-hour currency, or for a great deal of accuracy in future plans. Neither of these is probably feasible. I'm just asking that you bring Jira up to date with what you do know once every week or two. Is that reasonable? Thanks, -Ed Staub View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4023101#4023101 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4023101

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: streching the expression language

by kukeltje

btw, Seam uses an enhanced version of EL, wasn't there a jira issue to move to that one instead of the RI? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4023082#4023082 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4023082

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: various questions

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"gavin.king(a)jboss.com" wrote : The problem is nothing to do with proxies. AFAIR, there is no problem using foo.equals(bar) with a default implementation of equals. (Even if foo and bar are proxies.) | | The problem is that == is an incorrect implementation of equals, since two nonidentical objects with represent the same data (ie, the same row of the database) will not be equal. This is nothing to do with Hibernate. | | "business key" equality is the correct interpretation of equals() from a data modelling perspective. It represents what the *user* thinks of as the "same objects". there is no problem with proxy1.equals(proxy2). the problem appears when proxy1 is compared with its underlying real object. this happens when using proxies obtained from hibernate with the usage of 'this' (e.g. by passing 'this' as a parameter in another method) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4023070#4023070 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4023070

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: various questions

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

The problem is nothing to do with proxies. AFAIR, there is no problem using foo.equals(bar) with a default implementation of equals. (Even if foo and bar are proxies.) The problem is that == is an incorrect implementation of equals, since two nonidentical objects with represent the same data (ie, the same row of the database) will not be equal. This is nothing to do with Hibernate. "business key" equality is the correct interpretation of equals() from a data modelling perspective. It represents what the *user* thinks of as the "same objects". View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4023057#4023057 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4023057

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: streching the expression language

by kukeltje

Correct, but maybe it is something Tom build in on purpose ;-). You can add your own elements by disabling the validation, But I'd rather have that it could be done via namespaces. Since the processfile is stored in the db now, that opens up interesting things... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4023055#4023055 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4023055

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: streching the expression language

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

"kukeltje" wrote : I'm surprised that removing the schema results in no validation at all... not even wellformedness. This kind of behavior is not something I'd rely upon. But that's just me. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4023052#4023052 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4023052

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: streching the expression language

by kukeltje

I'm surprised that removing the schema results in no validation at all... not even wellformedness. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4023049#4023049 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4023049

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Inheriting from ProcessDefinition

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

alejandro, could you double check if you cannot revert to the ModuleDefinition ? I think it is strange that you bump into this problem now. I could add the discriminator, but that would imply we have to write a DB conversion script for 3.1.x to 3.2.x. As up to now, we only had addition of columns, tables and constraints. This would introduce the first update statement to be executed for a port from 3.1 to 3.2. so can you double check wether that isn't possible and give me some pointers on that ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4023044#4023044 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4023044

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: removed the examples from the eclipse classpath

by kukeltje

good idea, but this should be documented carefully. I see a lot of questions comming up in this area. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4023043#4023043 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4023043

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - What is PortalNode in IPC

by srinivasanj

What is PortalNode in IPC View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4023041#4023041 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4023041

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums February 2007