February 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss/Tomcat Integration] - Re: Bad deployment cleanup issues?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Ok. If that is the case we need better error reporting on why a 503 is being generated as it would seem that some assertion that should apply to a successful deployment is not satisfied. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013160#4013160 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013160

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Scoped beans deployment

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : | What about in the case when Scope annotation doesn't have a factory determining annotation? Ok, since we are the ones that will be providing these scope annotations, we can throw an exception or should presume some default ScopeKey? You can certainly avoid the factory for known types from the CommonLevel once the annotation format is agreed. If the annotation is not meta-annotated you could assume level=annotation.getClass().getSimpleName(); qualifier=annotation.value(); But this would need to use reflection (yuck! :-). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013158#4013158 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013158

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Relating configuration and monitoring

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Yes, but I"m not sure what else might need to be updated to support this yet. I believe the existing jmx notification based stuff should map over to an aspect that exposes a ManagedDeployment and its ManagedComponents as the jsr77 mbeans. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013155#4013155 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013155

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: JBossretro

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

No, we will use jbossretro to keep consistency with other javassist dependencies. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013153#4013153 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013153

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - JBossretro

by pgier

I noticed that retrotranslator has a maven plugin available: http://mojo.codehaus.org/retrotranslator-maven-plugin/ It is currently only in alpha, but it might be worth testing. Is it worth trying this out, or do we need to stick with jbossretro? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013148#4013148 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013148

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Scoped beans deployment

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | To make this work for generic scopes, the annotation will need to be meta-annotated | so we know what it means: | | | | public interface ScopeFactory<T extends Annotation> | | { | | ScopeKey create(T annotation); | | } | | | | public class InstanceScopeFactory<InstanceScope annotation> | | { | | public ScopeKey create(InstanceScope annotation) | | { | | return new ScopeKey(CommonLevels.INSTANCE, annotation.value()); | | } | | } | | | | @ScopeFactory(class=InstanceScopeFactory.class) | | public @interface InstanceScope | | { | | /** The bean name */ | | String value(); | | } | | For the last example we probably need new annotation with the same name as ScopeFactory interface. Any other possible name or diff package? I'm currently putting these things into org.jboss.metadata.spi.scope and org.jboss.metadata.plugins.scope in Container. What about in the case when Scope annotation doesn't have a factory determining annotation? Ok, since we are the ones that will be providing these scope annotations, we can throw an exception or should presume some default ScopeKey? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013145#4013145 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013145

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: ProfileServiceUnitTestCase tests failing

by charles.crouch＠jboss.com

I updated to r60366 and now just get one failure: Testcase: testProfileKeys took 2.183 sec Testcase: testDeploymentNames took 0.15 sec Testcase: testNoSuchProfileException took 0.05 sec Testcase: testDataSourceDeploymentType took 0.05 sec FAILED names.size > 0 junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: names.size > 0 at org.jboss.test.profileservice.test.ProfileServiceUnitTestCase.testDataSourceDeploymentType(ProfileServiceUnitTestCase.java:108) Testcase: testListDataSourceComponents took 0.18 sec Testcase: testAddDataSource took 0.621 sec Testcase: testRemoveComponent took 0.08 sec Testcase: testUpdateDataSource took 0.792 sec Testcase: testRemoveDataSource took 0.55 sec View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013143#4013143 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013143

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Relating configuration and monitoring

by charles.crouch＠jboss.com

Ok, given this, would you expect the JSR77 implementation to be based off these ManagedComponent's and ManagedProperty's? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013129#4013129 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013129

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss/Tomcat Integration] - Re: Bad deployment cleanup issues?

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

I'm speculating that the NPE from within Request.recycle() leaves the Request object in an inconsistent state. There are a number of cleanup operations that happen after the point where the NPE is thrown. Next request that uses the same processor has a problem. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013128#4013128 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013128

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Scoped beans deployment

by adrian＠jboss.org

The scopes/annotations still need to be defined. I have no idea what they should look like without delving deeper into use cases. For our tests you could just create the simple ones so you can do something like: |  | <policy> | <scope>@org.jboss.metadata.spi.annotations.JVMScope</scope> | <binding>...</binding> | </policy> | |  | <policy> | <scope>@org.jboss.metadata.spi.annotations.InstanceScope("BeanName")</scope> | <binding>...</binding> | </policy> | | | | | To make this work for generic scopes, the annotation will need to be meta-annotated | | so we know what it means: | | | | | | | public interface ScopeFactory<T extends Annotation> | | | { | | | ScopeKey create(T annotation); | | | } | | | | | | public class InstanceScopeFactory<InstanceScope annotation> | | | { | | | public ScopeKey create(T annotation) | | | { | | | return new ScopeKey(CommonLevels.INSTANCE, annotation.value()); | | | } | | | } | | | | | | @ScopeFactory(class=InstanceScopeFactory.class) | | | public @interface InstanceScope | | | { | | | /** The bean name */ | | | String value(); | | | } | | | | | | | You can also provide something that doesn't use annotations for common | | simple cases, | | e.g. | | | | | <scope level="Instance" qualifier="BeanName"/> | | | | | | | In general, your are going to have something more qualified like: | | | | | <scope level="Application" qualifier="MyDeployment.ear"/> | | | <scope level="Deployment" qualifier="MyWeb.war"/> | | | <scope level="Instance" qualifier="MyServlet"/> | | | | | | | This is all very speculative until we have gone through the use cases | | for how this will be used in real life. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4013118#4013118 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4013118

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums February 2007