March 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JCA AOP-MC Integration

by weston.price＠jboss.com

Damnit, I am a complete tool. I was trying to intercept non registered stuff (legacy JMX stuff) out of JCA. I was able to get it working. As a side note, the JMX introduction seems to work as well (simple case, simple bean). Thanks Scott. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4024802#4024802 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4024802

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Other JBoss Development Design] - Re: failing org.jboss.test.util.test.ThreadPoolRunnableUnitT

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

There have not been any changes, but this test uses the unreliable Thread.stop call. The call is ending with a ThreadDeath that is not being handled. Its not clear why this test would have worked in the based as BasicThreadPool.run never has handled this exception. I guess some vms are not throwing it. | 18:31:59,256 WARN [RunnableTaskWrapper] Unhandled throwable for runnable: org.jboss.test.util.test.ThreadPoolRunnableUnitTestCase$TestRunnable@be41ec | java.lang.ThreadDeath | at java.lang.Thread.stop(Thread.java:698) | at org.jboss.util.threadpool.RunnableTaskWrapper.stopTask(RunnableTaskWrapper.java:122) | at org.jboss.util.threadpool.BasicThreadPool$TimeoutInfo.stopTask(BasicThreadPool.java:517) | at org.jboss.util.threadpool.BasicThreadPool$TimeoutMonitor.run(BasicThreadPool.java:579) | at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4024801#4024801 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4024801

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JCA AOP-MC Integration

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Yes, provided what your intercepting is a bean. What is the test your trying? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4024797#4024797 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4024797

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JCA AOP-MC Integration

by weston.price＠jboss.com

Excellent. Thanks Scott, it's deploying. Just for clarification, using the aop-mc-int module I should be able to deploy and use aspects without having to use the aopc compiler or enable anything in the AspectManager/Deployer correct? Or is there something I am missing? The reason I ask is that even after succesfully deploying, the aspect does nothing. I can see it deploying and the AspectManager at least knows about the definition (via JMX console) but it's not being invoked. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4024792#4024792 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4024792

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Build System Meeting Agenda Mar 01, 2007

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

How is the repository selected? While being able to make dev releases is good, a release that is incorporated into a shared build still cannot be an arbitrary thing. Having a graph of unstable dependencies on items in a snapshot release state is a bad thing. If I put out a 2.0.0.Beta3 build of the mc to the snapshot repository and link jbossas to it, I don't expect that it will change. Certainly not in an incompatible way. Why not have a single maven repo under svn where only devs with release tech permission can put out non-snapshot releases? Does svn support that type of filename pattern permissions or is it only path based? Having the repo under svn (not cvs due to refactoring problems) is a good thing for tracking who changed what. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4024787#4024787 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4024787

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JCA AOP-MC Integration

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Try: | <bean name="TraceAspect" class="org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.Aspect"> | <property name="advice"><inject bean="TraceAdvice"/></property> | <property name="manager"><inject bean="AspectManager" property="aspectManager"/></property> | </bean> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4024785#4024785 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4024785

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Browser-based configuration editor

by mark.little＠jboss.com

Hi Derek. Thanks for the tools and please give us input on anything else you'd like to see added. BTW, don't be shy about the Mac: all of the best s/w is developed on it ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4024778#4024778 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4024778

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Browser-based configuration editor

by derek.adams

"daniel.brum(a)jboss.com" wrote : is the Adobe toolkit capable of running say in a linux based browser? Yep. We have people in the office running Flex2 apps on Windows/IE, Linux/Firefox, and even.. dare I say it.. a Mac ;) ... all you need is the latest Flash plugin for your platform. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4024767#4024767 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4024767

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Browser-based configuration editor

by kurt.stam＠jboss.com

Yep that sure helps Derek. Thanks again, this is a very nice addition! --Kurt View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4024765#4024765 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4024765

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Browser-based configuration editor

by daniel.brum＠jboss.com

I just tested the tool, deployed several QuickStarts. Very nice work. is the Adobe toolkit capable of running say in a linux based browser? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4024764#4024764 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4024764

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2007