March 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Portal] - jboss portal core in maven2 repository?

by FredF

I am using the portal core api from my own web project and I intend to build my project with Maven2. Where can I find the portal jar-files so that Maven2 can use them as dependencies and add them to my local repository? I am using portal-core-lib.jar portal-common.jar portal-theme-lib.jar thanx View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4031493#4031493 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4031493

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Two action in the same portlet

by thomas.heute＠jboss.com

Use the User forum (Read the "read me first" of this forum) I move this topic View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4031491#4031491 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4031491

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: InvocationContext in JBCMethodCall?

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

I agree, this is my plan, except that rather than use JBCMethodCall, I plan to use the Invocation object from JBoss AOP (from JBC 2.1.x) and pass in a MethodCall object as a part of the Invocation. The ThreadLocal is ugly and will go in time. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4031489#4031489 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4031489

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: org.jboss.test.cts.test.MDBUnitTestCase

by sergeypk

This problem apparently also occurs in SessionAspect.handleCreateObjectMessage and ConsumerAspect.handleReceive. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4031472#4031472 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4031472

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Advanced MessageStore implementation

by tpeuss

Sorry guys! I was not precise enough for you to understand what the goal of such an implementation would be: It should be a base for transaction analysis tool where you can look at all the messages (or parts of it) that have flown through your system. I am pretty sure that you agree that this is not possible with a MessageStore implementation that is in place in ESB nor with the one from the Messaging code (I had a look at this, too). CU Thomas View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4031469#4031469 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4031469

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: org.jboss.test.cts.test.MDBUnitTestCase

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I have changed SessionAspect to also validate the size of arguments. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4031464#4031464 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4031464

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Two action in the same portlet

by srinivasanj

Hai i am using JBoss Portlet for my application, i had to several doubts in the JBoss Portal 1. i am using two action in the same JSR 168 portlet . my first action i mapping if(name!=null){dispatch..... b.jsp) else(dispatch....a.jsp}. my second action in the b.jsp it need to move c.jsp.///rly i had more action in the portlet where i need to map weather i need to create seperate portlet class or map in the same portlet class. if i map in the seperate portlet class what are the thing i need to do. 2. i am using AJAX in my JSR 168 Portlet my XMLHttpRequest where i need to set. 3. i had my HTTPsession where i need to call answer this question anyone after i getting answer this question only i need to proceed my application. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4031461#4031461 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4031461

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: SFSB proxy creation process incorrectly routed locally

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

JIRA for this is http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-925. A fix that will give behavior consistent with the objective of EJBTHREE-773 is: 1) For clustered SFSBs, the StatefulClusterProxyFactory should be registered with the Dispatcher with a name like this: container.getObjectName().getCanonicalName() + ",element=ProxyFactory,partition=" + container.getPartitionName() With this, the call to the proxy factory will route locally if the target factory is associated with the same bean name in the same deployment package in the same cluster partition; otherwise it will go remote. 2) For non-clustered SFSBs, use of different partition names is not available as a means to distinguish two identical deployments on separate groups of servers. The stated objective of EJBTHREE-773 was to have the call go remote if this kind of deployment exists and the client does a lookup on a remote server, so: a) The client interceptor stack for the ProxyFactory proxy will not include the o.j.aspects.IsLocalInterceptor. This should be fine. For this call there are no later client-side interceptors that should be bypassed if the call is local. And Remoting already detects if the call's InvokerLocator points to a local server, and bypasses any marshalling if it is. So, getting rid of this interceptor allows calls to go remote but shouldn't noticeably the handling of legitimate local calls. b) the StatefulRemoteProxyFactory will be registered with the Dispatcher with a name like the above, minus the partition attribute. Given a) above this isn't really necessary, but it seems like a safer name (e.g. if someone some day restores the IsLocalInterceptor you won't end up with proxy creation calls going to completely unrelated beans.) I've implented the above on my Branch_4_2 working copy and the tests I wrote that surfaced this now pass. I'm running the full ejb3 testsuite overnight; if no issues pop up I'll check it in in the morning. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4031458#4031458 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4031458

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - JBossESB 4.2 MR1 released

by mark.little＠jboss.com

We've just released MR1 of the 4.2 release. Check out our blog for more details. http://jbossesb.blogspot.com/2007/03/jbossesb-42-milestone-release-1-is-o... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4031415#4031415 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4031415

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Advanced MessageStore implementation

by mark.little＠jboss.com

I took a quick look at http://labs.jboss.com/file-access/default/members/jbossmessaging/freezone... and there certainly seems to be something we could base an implementation on. I'll check with Tim when he returns to see if there's any advanced search and indexing facilities. If not, we can always implement them ourselves. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4031414#4031414 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4031414

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2007