March 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss internal QA (Test Suite)] - Re: Testsuite checks for classloader leaks

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

In progress; should be done today. You want it on Branch_4_2 as well? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4026747#4026747 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4026747

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss internal QA (Test Suite)] - Re: Testsuite checks for classloader leaks

by ryan.campbell＠jboss.com

Very nice Brian, we've needed something like this for a while. I see test of EJB deployments; what about EJB3, ie, something which would catch http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3071 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4026738#4026738 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4026738

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Issue with JSF <f:view> tag

by stan.silvert＠jboss.com

You need to extend MyFacesGenericPortlet instead. See http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Using_Portlets Stan http://jsf.jboss.org View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4026732#4026732 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4026732

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss internal QA (Test Suite)] - Testsuite checks for classloader leaks

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

On today's TCK call I mentioned some basic tests I'd added the check for these. For those interested, the tests are documented at http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=ClassloaderLeakUnitTestCase. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4026731#4026731 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4026731

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - processInstance.signal DelegationException in a Servlet

by bgphp

I am trying to test a simple processDefinition in servlet...i always get ' DelegationException in processInstance.signal();' org.jbpm.graph.def.DelegationException org.jbpm.graph.def.GraphElement.raiseException(GraphElement.java:352) org.jbpm.graph.def.GraphElement.raiseException(GraphElement.java:346) org.jbpm.graph.def.GraphElement.executeAction(GraphElement.java:249) org.jbpm.graph.def.GraphElement.executeActions(GraphElement.java:212) org.jbpm.graph.def.GraphElement.fireAndPropagateEvent(GraphElement.java:182) org.jbpm.graph.def.GraphElement.fireEvent(GraphElement.java:166) org.jbpm.graph.def.Node.enter(Node.java:301) org.jbpm.graph.def.Transition.take(Transition.java:119) org.jbpm.graph.def.Node.leave(Node.java:383) org.jbpm.graph.node.StartState.leave(StartState.java:70) org.jbpm.graph.exe.Token.signal(Token.java:178) org.jbpm.graph.exe.Token.signal(Token.java:123) org.jbpm.graph.exe.ProcessInstance.signal(ProcessInstance.java:217) org.example.web.WorkflowExcecuteServlet.SimpleNodeActionsFlow(WorkflowExcecuteServlet.java:162) Servlet code looks like this.. DefnString is : <process-definition> <start-state> <transition to=\'start\'/> </start-state> <state name=\'start\'> <event type=\'node-enter\'> <action class=\'org.example.web.MyActionHandler\'/> <event type=\'node-leave\'> <action class=\'org.example.web.MyActionHandler\'/> <transition to=\'end\'/> <end-state name=\'end\' /> </process-definition> ProcessDefinition processDefinition = ProcessDefinition.parseXmlString( defnString ); ProcessInstance processInstance = new ProcessInstance(processDefinition); // The next signal will cause the execution to leave the start // state and enter the state 's'. So the state 's' is entered // and hence the action is executed. processInstance.signal(); Can you someone help me ..what is wrong with this code? thanks BG View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4026704#4026704 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4026704

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: No LastResource gambit for non-xa MDB

by weston.price＠jboss.com

LOL!!!!! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4026700#4026700 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4026700

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Major transaction problem

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

Ok, I think this issue is resolved. Enabling transactions and clearing out the hibernate session data fixed it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4026695#4026695 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4026695

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: No LastResource gambit for non-xa MDB

by adrian＠jboss.org

Happy as in "Happy Gilmore" - oblivious :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4026692#4026692 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4026692

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: No LastResource gambit for non-xa MDB

by adrian＠jboss.org

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | You are back to "transaction observer" semantics for BMT/Not Supported. That is the UserTransaction can quite happily commit, but then the MDB throws an NPE afterwards. We happily rollback the delivery. Equivalently, the MDB happily commits the UserTransaction but we later find we can't commit the jms session. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4026691#4026691 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4026691

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: No LastResource gambit for non-xa MDB

by adrian＠jboss.org

Yes, that is why it is madness=true. You are back to "transaction observer" semantics for BMT/Not Supported. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4026688#4026688 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4026688

19 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2007