April 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - about actions behavior

by ricardomarques

Hi all I've read about the Actions but I'm here width some questions, that i appreciate some feedback: Can a action accept arguments and variables? Is an action always associated with a process, or i could have the same action for various process deployed? Can i retrieve the list of Actions avaiable? >From a Action instance from a certain process, can I access to another process instance? Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4039783#4039783 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4039783

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss/Tomcat Integration] - Pass session id in url

by A_titov82

Hello. I need to pass session id (jsessionid) in url, not in cookies in spite of cookies are on. Is it possible? Is there any option in application descriptor xml files? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4039706#4039706 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4039706

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Channel creation - mux vs. old style

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

A little more on why I don't want to support JMX lookup of the JChannelFactory -- besides the fact that in an IOC world, writing lookup code seems bogus. Doing a JMX lookup presupposes that the MBeanServer is available before the call to Cache.create(). Otherwise, you can't do the lookup. In an AS 3.2.x or 4.x environment, that was a safe assumption, as that's the way the ServiceController worked. But if someone had created their cache programatically, it might have broken. That is, they could instantiate their cache, call startService() and then register it in JMX. In 2.0, the coupling between the JMX wrapper and the Cache lifecycle is weaker. There's no strong reason to assume JMX registration will occur before create(). Adding logic to CacheJmxWrapper so it can deal with a situation where create is called first just adds complexity. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4039676#4039676 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4039676

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Channel creation - mux vs. old style

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

Getting around to dealing with JBCACHE-934. Looking at it, I don't see any reason to support injection of an object name as a config attribute and then having JBC code do a JMX lookup of the channel factory. The channel factory should just be injected, either directly into the RuntimeConfig, or indirectly via a setter in CacheLegacyJmxWrapper. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4039670#4039670 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4039670

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Idiot's guide to setting up mc build in Eclipse?

by alesj

I get a page with 0 tests - file:///C:/projects/microcontainer/target/site/surefire-report.html. | Summary | Tests Errors Failures Skipped Success Rate Time | 0 0 0 0 0% 0 | | Note: failures are anticipated and checked for with assertions while errors are unanticipated. Am I looking at the wrong place? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4039637#4039637 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4039637

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Idiot's guide to setting up mc build in Eclipse?

by pgier

I don't know if this is the easiest way, but one thing you can do is use the surefire report plugin like this: | mvn surefire-report:report | That will generate an html report located in target/site/surefire-report.html. If you want the report to show only failures, you can run it like this: | mvn -DshowSuccess=false surefire-report:report | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4039619#4039619 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4039619

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Bug in transactional delivery in an MDB

by timfox

"weston.price(a)jboss.com" wrote : This would be an unusual case as most JMS providers provide both a non XA and an optional XA CF to create the underlying connection. | | JBM would be the only JMS provider I have seen to date where you could not deploy a non XA JMS resource. WebSphereMQ, TIBCO, ActiveMQ, JBossMQ etc provide XA as an option as this is the only behavior mandated by the spec where the XA is optional. | | Well, yes I agree this may be unusual, although I don't believe it it illegal. It seems to me the JCA is making an incorrect assumption that a particular connection instance can't be both a Connection and an XAConnection. It just so happens up to now JBM is the only provider that implements it this way. Having said all that, to get this fixed quickly, it should be fairly trivial for us to make the change in JBM to separate out the Connection and XAConnection classes. So I suggest we do that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4039605#4039605 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4039605

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Idiot's guide to setting up mc build in Eclipse?

by alesj

What's the easiest way to see which tests fail? If I do something like 'mvn test > tests.txt' I get a 2.5MB big text file, not being able to distinguish between expected failures and the actual ones. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4039568#4039568 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4039568

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Bug in transactional delivery in an MDB

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I guess we will have to make a clear distinction between XA and non XA connections. http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-945 Tim? What you think? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4039556#4039556 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4039556

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Bug in transactional delivery in an MDB

by weston.price＠jboss.com

This would be an unusual case as most JMS providers provide both a non XA and an optional XA CF to create the underlying connection. What I am reading is that JBM does not provide the former as a standalone CF option. The problem is that on the JCA side of things there is no way to determine from the 'transacted' parameter whether or not XA or non XA is to be used being that with XA this flag is simply ignored. In other words, the value of that flag is irrelevant in detrmining what type of connection to use (XA or non XA) being that there is not enough contextual information to make that determination. The only way to really do this would be to add a 'useXA' or 'isXA' type flag to the adapter that when present, would completely override the instanceof check to determine if it's XA or not. I am reluctant to do this as this as this would be the only case with a JMS provider where it it is necessary. JBM would be the only JMS provider I have seen to date where you could not deploy a non XA JMS resource. WebSphereMQ, TIBCO, ActiveMQ, JBossMQ etc provide XA as an option as this is the only behavior mandated by the spec where the XA is optional. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4039469#4039469 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4039469

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums April 2007