April 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Configuration & CacheImpl overlap of concerns

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

I agree with Brian. Furthermore, the configuration is a static representation of values that define how the cache behaves. Contruction is a different story. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037992#4037992 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037992

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - JSR 203 - More New I/O APIs for the JavaTM Platform

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

The Early Draft Review Specification for JSR 203 - More New I/O APIs for the JavaTM Platform ("NIO.2") is now available for Review from the list of Early Draft Reviews page http://jcp.org/en/jsr/stage?listBy=community and also the JSR 203 detail page: http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=203 This review closes on 27 May 2007. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037990#4037990 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037990

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: Security deployer

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

No, but the current security domain processing needs to be pulled out from the various containers and replaced with injection of the deployment security api encapsulation so that its consistently handled and administratable. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037987#4037987 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037987

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Security deployer

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

Anything technically stopping us from writing a security deployer so that you can deploy security domains along with your deployments? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037983#4037983 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037983

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Compatibility between WS and later versions of remoting

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

The latest version 1.2.1.GA works in all appservers with all 3 remoting version. For previous versions of jbossws, I'll have to dig up the compatibility information. 1.2.1.GA is currently installed in jbossas/trunk jbossas/branches/Branch_4_2 jbossas/branches/Branch_4_0 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037978#4037978 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037978

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Compatibility between WS and later versions of remoting

by timfox

I'm not sure I understand the table. Basically I just want to know that if I drop JBoss Remoting 2.2.0.GA into server/lib in JBoss AS 4.0.1.SP1 or later, is it going to break web services in the app server? To put it another way, do all your versions of webservices work with JBoss Remoting 2.2.0.GA? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037973#4037973 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037973

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Compatibility between WS and later versions of remoting

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Have a look at our release QA matrix http://jbws.dyndns.org:8180/hudson/view/Release%20QA/ jbossws-1.2.1 is compatible with these jboss projects | # JBossAS-5.0 | jboss-jbossxb-jboss50=2.0.0.CR2 | jboss-microcontainer-jboss50=2.0.0.Beta3 | jboss-remoting-jboss50=2.2.0.GA | | # JBossAS-4.2 | jboss-jbossxb-jboss42=1.0.0.CR10 | jboss-microcontainer-jboss42=1.0.2 | jboss-remoting-jboss42=2.0.0.GA | | # JBossAS-4.0 | jboss-jbossxb-jboss40=1.0.0.CR10 | jboss-microcontainer-jboss40=1.0.2 | jboss-remoting-jboss40=1.4.3.GA | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037961#4037961 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037961

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Finding the EPR for a provider from a notifier

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

We should create another discussion on this based on the MC beanitizing of ESB that I want to do. Derek, what if ESB supported JCA? That would be a perfect way to plug in inbound/outbound adapters. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037948#4037948 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037948

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Generated component-info.xml for aggregate project is wrong

by wolfc

I just noticed that the generated component-info.xml for the javaee aggregate project is wrong. 1. The second artifact should be 'jboss-javaee.jar'; | 2. The export should include an 'include jboss-javaee.jar'; | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | | <project xmlns="http://www.jboss.org/component-info/1.0" | | xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | | xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.jboss.org/component-info/1.0 http://repository.jboss.org/component-info-v1_0.xsd" | | name="jboss/jboss-javaee-component-info"> | | <component id="jboss/jboss-javaee" | | licenseType="lgpl" | | version="5.0.0-SNAPSHOT" | | description="The JBoss JavaEE API classes" | | | | > | | | | <artifact id="jboss-javaee-sources.jar"/> | | <artifact id="jboss-javaee-null.jar"/> | | | | | | <export> | | | | </export> | | </component> | | </project> View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037946#4037946 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037946

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Patching app server versus scoping messaging

by timfox

Thanks. One less thing to worry about then :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4037944#4037944 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4037944

18 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums April 2007