Ronald,
anonymous wrote : Yes, that is true if gpd info is a e.g. a child of a processelement, not if it is in a different section in the xml. You still need to maintain/update the relations then just like with two files. (or maybe I have a completely wrong perception of the term sections)
I think we mean the same thing by section. If they're in the same file, a bug in GPD could get them skewed, but very few external events or conditions can. Think of it like a record in a database. You …
[View More]COULD forget to update a field, but in general if you update everything in one statement, you can be confident you won't only get only half of it on disk. (I'm ignoring transactions.)
My thinking is badly colored by a recent bug in GPD where, if I remember correctly, it would write a 0-length gpd.xml. Getting all of your nodes dumped in a heap in the corner of the "room" (canvas) was just plain rude!
-Ed
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4044427#4044427
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4044427
[View Less]
I'm trying to get a publicly downloadable AOP 2.0.0.alpha5 release together, and one of the main things stopping me at the moment is getting it to deploy in JBoss 4.0.x. This is due to AOP's dependency on the MC metadata stuff, which obviously does not exist in the beans.deployer for JBoss 4. I don't want to force users to update to use the new beta MC jars there.
There is a jboss-container-metadata-spi.jar that is generated as part of the container build which I think would provide the …
[View More]classes that are needed to get it to run, but that is unreleased and does not exist in any of the maven/thirdparty repositories. Are there any plans for some kind of beta release of this sometime soon?
I also need to support JDK 1.4, so I need a retroed version of the spi as well.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4044335#4044335
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4044335
[View Less]