July 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Providing bean name aware feature

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : | I'll add them both - xml is OOTB. | This part is commited. Use this until the MC beans annotation handling. I'll add a comment here and to the JBMICROCONT-192 once that is done. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4064907#4064907 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4064907

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JMSRouter refactoring

by beve

anonymous wrote : I'm concerned you're starting to mix requirements. We have splitter and aggregator capabilities elsewhere too. Yes, so am I. This was more of a desperate solution to get things working for me. Should I use the Notifiers for this? In this case I have to add the correlation stuff and that would require some refactoring of NotifyQueue and NotifyTopics. Is this alright? I'll also check out the wiretap as I havn't done so yet. thanks, Daniel View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4064902#4064902 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4064902

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[QA of JBoss Portal] - Re: SSO Unit Testing

by julien＠jboss.com

can we suppose of course that what you call portal1 and portal2 are plain old war files that are customized to use the correct auth config and a special servlets ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4064901#4064901 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4064901

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JMSRouter refactoring

by mark.little＠jboss.com

"tfennelly" wrote : This sounds like wiretap to me. | And I'm fairly sure we have that too. anonymous wrote : I think the whole area of routing messages off the bus (to ESB Message Unaware endpoints) is something that needs attention. We Gateways for getting messages on and the Notifiers and Routers (and possibly more) for getting them off. Grrr!!! Agreed, but we've already agreed that it's good enough for the 4.2GA release. So let's not go opening that up again ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4064900#4064900 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4064900

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JMSRouter refactoring

by tfennelly

This sounds like wiretap to me. I think the whole area of routing messages off the bus (to ESB Message Unaware endpoints) is something that needs attention. We Gateways for getting messages on and the Notifiers and Routers (and possibly more) for getting them off. Grrr!!! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4064899#4064899 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4064899

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JMSRouter refactoring

by mark.little＠jboss.com

I'm concerned you're starting to mix requirements. We have splitter and aggregator capabilities elsewhere too. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4064898#4064898 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4064898

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Cause overwrite problem

by wolfc

On an initial glance it looks like we've reached the limit what we can do without proper security integration. The security deployer currently only works with EJB 2 meta data and EJB 3 meta data isn't being augmented with annotations yet. So as a work around the EJB registration deployer tells the security deployer to ignore this deployment. We need the unified meta model before we can move on. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4064862#4064862 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4064862

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Running with the full featured profile service

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I made some changes and checked it in, but I'm seeing other issues throwing errors on startup of both this profileservice config and the default config currently. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4064838#4064838 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4064838

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBAS-4206 - ProfileService and TODOs about ClassLoader

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

That would be ok if the ServerLoader bootstrap class loader could be an osgi style class loader to have more control over what is exported. There are too many bootstrap jars that should not be visible to other deployments (trove.jar, dom4j.jar, concurrent.jar, log4j.jar, jaxb*, stax*) or we end up with thirdparty code that should only be an implementation detail in the bootstrap classpath. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4064836#4064836 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4064836

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Profile Service and Scanners

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

That would result in a profile impl that would have a different api that the repository based profile impl as far as I can see. I think the profile content api needs to be better fleshed out first to clean this up. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4064834#4064834 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4064834

18 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2007