July 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JMSRouter refactoring

by mark.little＠jboss.com

Can you point me at some relevant code in the tree? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063850#4063850 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4063850

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JMSHeader fields

by mark.little＠jboss.com

"bill.burke(a)jboss.com" wrote : Off topic, but related, but maybe it would be better for ESB Message interface to have a similar hierarchy to JMS? What I mean is: | | Message | | | ObjectMessage, StringMessage, MapMessage | | We know that ESB has a richer message semantic, but from what I saw a few months ago, its has a one-interface-fits all for its payload. | | Just a thought. | Interesting. I've created a JIRA http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-684 so we don't lose this one. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063847#4063847 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4063847

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JCA AOP-MC Integration

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

The aop snapshot in maven is not updated, and so does not contain the fix I added to solve this issue. This is due to this issue http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063655#4063655 As a temporary fix, try overwriting your local maven snapshot with the jar from the old thirdparty repository http://repository.jboss.org/jboss/aop/snapshot/lib/jboss-aop-jdk50.jar View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063842#4063842 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4063842

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - JMSRouter refactoring

by beve

Hi, we are using the JMSRouter and would like to use the setting of the correlation id which is now being done, or will after MR3 is released. More info about the correlation id can be found here http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBESB-652 Now, this is all good except that we want to be able to set the property unwrap to true, and still have the correlation id set. This is currenlty not possible as unwrap will will extract the content of the Message's body (in AbstractRouter) and then pass that Object to JMSRouter's process method, hence the information from the Message object being lost and there is no way to set the outgoing messages correlation id to the Message objects ID. The way I would like it do be is that setting unwrap to true means that I want the content of the Message objects body to be routed and the setting of JMSProperties should be performed. The short term solution for this might be to change the createObjectMessage to be protected so that I can subclass it to suite my needs. But I think setting unwrap to true would be more logical, but other routers might depend on the current behaviour. Any thought? Thanks, Daniel View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063836#4063836 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4063836

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: current logged users

by thomas.heute＠jboss.com

I'm pretty sure bolek started with concurrent libs. JSM is an idea but probably a bit overkill. I don't think Bolek commited any code yet that you could look at. But if you can help him it would be great. You can both discuss design issues here. He will probably be online later today. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063827#4063827 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4063827

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: current logged users

by sviluppatorefico

hi thomas....I started some day ago to see about a asynchronous queue to manage together with concurrent libs, but if this is done and it is confirmed I could leave it and starting from frontend, otherwise I would like to cooperate with bolek about this argument. actually I've some question about it. What do you think about using JMS instead to use directly concurrent libs? We could to get advanges about authentication and distribution of messages. Administrator could to manage groups of users and manage which users or groups, a user can to see....maybe it is extreme for a 'users portlet' but JMS could to be used also for advanced management portlet..... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063823#4063823 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4063823

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: JBoss/JCA Maven Build

by vickyk

"pgier" wrote : | I think that pretty much sums up our options | 1 - Break into separate projects | 2 - Create maven plugin to generate artifacts | 3 - use ant to build the jars | The Option 1 looks simpler , so I continue with it . I separated the projects as | jboss-jca | ------->pom.xml | ------>core | ---------->jbossjcacore-impl | ------->src | ------->pom.xml | ---------->jbossjcacore-spi | ------->src | ------->pom.xml | ---------->pom.xml | ------->adapter | -->src | -->pom.xml Now building of the jbossjcacore-impl needs the jbossjcacore-spi generated jar file . I wanted to know if I can use the generated spi.jar SNAPSHOT from the local system , using server to download it through depends would work ... I wanted to know if I can use it locally . View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063816#4063816 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4063816

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Transaction Services] - Listen address of JBossTS ports not configurable

by huuskart

See JBTM-253. JBossTS opens a bunch of network ports (three, I think, but debug output only mentions two) it listens on, but JBossTS does not give me the option to specify at which address it listens for connections. As such, this is not a bug or error. However, standard practice in practically every single network listening software is to give the option for the administrator to specify at which address the software listens on. JBoss AS also gives this option, it even has a global system property jboss.bind.address, and every single service except JBossTS can be separately configured to listen on a particular address, and by default the services usually are configured to listen on ${jboss.bind.address}. I want to see JBossTS also support this. My ultimate reason for this is simply the fact that I hate to have services listening globally on ports they have no business or need listening on. Of course my servers are firewalled, so there's no problem of getting rogue connections, but even so, if I'm running a simple single JBoss AS instance, nothing will ever need to connect to JBossTS services from outside of the localhost, then I want to configure JBossTS so that it listens only on localhost. But really, for complex installations there may be even real reasons why this needs to be configured. The server could have multiple IP addresses, run several JBoss instances, and would need to configure JBossTS in each instance to listen on different IP. >From another point of view, I could ask that if JBossTS does not need to support this configuration option, why would any service in JBoss support it, and why does JBossTS support configuring even the port at all, if listen address configuration need not be supported (these two really always go hand in hand). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063814#4063814 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4063814

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Tagging is not possible anymore because of Thirdparty

by wolfc

Is it in JavaEE 6? Then it should be part of the JavaEE 6 snapshot. Time to branch in that case. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063812#4063812 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4063812

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: security for cms portlet ..please help!!!

by thomas.heute＠jboss.com

Should be in User forum... (not this one). I move your topic. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063800#4063800 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4063800

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2007