July 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Where do we want to put

by mark.little＠jboss.com

Owing to a conflict, I won't be able to make the meeting today. In case this comes up: I'm not against the idea of common jars. We do the same thing in TS and other projects have similar approaches. The issue I have is whether or not it makes sense for us given that everything depends on rosetta anyway and we're fast approaching the GA release date. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061926#4061926 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061926

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Where do we want to put

by mark.little＠jboss.com

"tfennelly" wrote : At the moment, this seems to be getting dumped in the "rosetta" codebase, meaning that if you have a service that needs a particular utility, it ends up being dependent on the core of the ESB. I think this statement is the one that really confused me. What services are we developing that don't have a dependency on the core of the ESB ;-)?! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061918#4061918 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061918

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Where do we want to put

by tfennelly

If that's what you want ;-( View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061917#4061917 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061917

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Where do we want to put

by mark.little＠jboss.com

Everything depends on rosetta. What's the advantage of introducing something else for it to depend on? If there was some way you could use the services without needing rosetta and yet needing "common stuff", then I might agree. apache commons works because it's used by a range of other projects. We're not quite there yet. The refactoring of core to rosetta made sense given what we'd done with the services. This seems like refactoring for the sake of it. But maybe I'm missing something ;-)? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061913#4061913 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061913

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Where do we want to put

by tfennelly

Sorry... the title got truncated. Was supposed to read... "Where do we want to put support/utility code". View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061876#4061876 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061876

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Where do we want to put

by tfennelly

1. We have code in the "rosetta" codebase. This is the "core" of the ESB - listeners, actions, couriers, lifecycle code etc. 2. We have "services" code. These are modules that supply a specific service capability to a .esb module. They're packaged as a .esb. Something that's been missing (IMO) is a home for "commons"/"support"/"utilility" type code e.g. stream, string, http etc utility code. At the moment, this seems to be getting dumped in the "rosetta" codebase, meaning that if you have a service that needs a particular utility, it ends up being dependent on the core of the ESB. Couldn't we have an "esb-commons" (ala apache commons) type module that just contains support type utility code? OK, we could continue with the monolithic approach that we currently have, or perhaps we could create an "jbossesb-commons" in "extras". Another alternative might be to create a .esb for it (yeuck :-) ). I know we had the "rosetta" codebase before and we've just got rid of it. Not sure that was really all that "common" anyway. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061875#4061875 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061875

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Scheduling of services

by beve

Yeah sure, I'll see what I can do. /Daniel View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061828#4061828 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061828

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Clustering on JBoss (Clusters/JBoss)] - Re: Using JBossSerialization with HttpSession Replication (J

by ricardoarguello

I have backported JBAS-2921 to 4.0.5.GA, but I have one problem: ClusteredSession.canAttributeBeReplicated() will always return false if the attribute does not implement Serializable. Was this supposed to be used with FieldBasedClusteredSession only? Ricardo Argüello View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061826#4061826 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061826

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Initial UI Server Prototype Discussion

by julien＠jboss.com

Just to be clear, I don't want to endup with a fat class like : | public class AorBorC { | | // Types | public static final int A_TYPE = 0; | public static final int B_TYPE = 1; | public static final int C_TYPE = 2; | | // Type | private int type; | | // Common attributes | private String commonAtt1; | private String commonAtt2; | | // Only apply to A | private int specificAttForA; | | // Only apply to B or C | private int specificAttForBorC; | | // Only apply to C | private int specificAttForC; | } | The example of hierarchy of class I am talking about is similar to org.jboss.portal.portlet.invocation.response.PortletInvocationResponse View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061791#4061791 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061791

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Scheduling of services

by mark.little＠jboss.com

Any chance you could create a diagram illustrating the components (services etc.) in your use case? Stick it on the wiki and then refer to it here. That'd make any discussion easier and less prone to misinterpretation of what you're doing. Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061758#4061758 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061758

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2007