July 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Portal build (Repost)

by julien＠jboss.com

If we decide to keep the current build, it needs a serious cleanup to remove unnecessary stuff and fix issues. We should answer the following questions: - identify the current issues of the current build - what does buildmagic buys us ? could we get rid of it ? - which ant extensions would bring value ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061268#4061268 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061268

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Portal build

by julien＠jboss.com

If we decide to keep buildmagic, it needs a serious cleanup to remove unnecessary stuff and fix issues. We should answer the following questions: - identify the current issues of the current build - what does buildmagic buys us ? could we get rid of it ? - which ant extensions would bring value ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061268#4061268 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061268

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Optimistic locking doesn't scale well with large 'flat'

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

I've created a JIRA for this so it doesn't get "lost"... JBCACHE-1121 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061267#4061267 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061267

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Portal build

by julien＠jboss.com

Does using ant precludes to publish jars to a repository ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061266#4061266 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061266

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Java 5 migration strategy

by julien＠jboss.com

I agree with most of it, except that some part needs to be carefully designed when migrated to generics. I started to read about it, and generics are not trivial to introduce in a framework when that framework manipulates reflection code. So those parts should be done carefully. Any non trivial migration to Java 5 syntax should be discussed and reviewed before. "bdaw" wrote : Actually I don't see the big problem here: | - we don't need to upgrade whole codebase to the java 5 syntax (time consuming + branch sync issues) | - when you bug fix you code with backport (svn merge) in mind so probably won't use new syntax anywa... | - when you add new features you change/refactor a lot so such part can't be backported easily, and probably isn't supposed to be backported at all.... | | So lets naturally use java 5 in trunk for new stuff and during refactorings, and don't upgrade old code "just to". | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061265#4061265 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061265

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Java 5 migration strategy

by julien＠jboss.com

This makes sense. "thomas.heute(a)jboss.com" wrote : And bug fixes should be made on the Portal_Branch_2_6 (JDK1.4) then ported to trunk (with optional JDK5 syntax) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061263#4061263 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061263

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Java 5 migration strategy (Repost)

by thomas.heute＠jboss.com

And bug fixes should be made on the Portal_Branch_2_6 (JDK1.4) then ported to trunk (with optional JDK5 syntax) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061205#4061205 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061205

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Precedence

by adrian＠jboss.org

It's not a loop. The deployers are: 1) input=null, output=test 2) input=test, output=test 3) input=test, output=test 4) input=test, output=null (2) and (3) are "filters", they input and output the same attachment. If a deployer inputs and outputs the same attachment then it shouldn't be considered as creating a loop. The above is the correct order. (2) and (3) looks ambigous, e.g. they could be other way around but they are actually resolved using the Ordered.COMPARATOR. In this case, the toString() on the deployer "3" is after "2" since the relativeOrders are the same. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061260#4061260 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061260

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: AOP and MC integration tasks

by adrian＠jboss.org

"b_georges" wrote : Hi | | Is there any additional tasks that need to be created in respect to the Microcontainer/AOP integration? | | If not we can close: | | http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAOP-232Create JIRA issues for TODOs in the Microcontainer/AOP integration | We can't close this. yet. The prupose of this task is to document all the TODOs in the aop-mc-int project that are not in JIRA. From which we can prioritize and schedule them. There are 30 according to eclipse, although I think some of them are redundant, e.g. | MockJNDIProvider | public NamingEnumeration<NameClassPair> list(String name) throws NamingException | { | // TODO Auto-generated method stub | return null; | } | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061258#4061258 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061258

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Running with the full featured profile service

by adrian＠jboss.org

Do a full rebuild, i.e. ./build.sh clean before building View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061255#4061255 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061255

18 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2007