January 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Aggregator bug?

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

Thanks very much for this, you are correct. This is a race that needs to be fixed. I'll log a bug against the aggregator code. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121299#4121299 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121299

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Aggregator bug?

by kadlecp

Hello, I am playing with org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.Aggregator. I can see that there has been some changes recently. But I thing I have found a bug that has not been found yet. There are in org.jboss.soa.esb.actions.Aggregator lines | ConcurrentHashMap<String, Message> messageMap=null; | //Get the messageMap with this uuId, or create it if not found | if (_aggregatedMessageMap.containsKey(uuId)) { | messageMap = _aggregatedMessageMap.get(uuId); | } else { | messageMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<String, Message>(); | } | I think that there should be | ConcurrentHashMap<String, Message> messageMap=null; | //Get the messageMap with this uuId, or create it if not found | synchronized(this) | if (_aggregatedMessageMap.containsKey(uuId)) { | messageMap = _aggregatedMessageMap.get(uuId); | } else { | messageMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<String, Message>(); | } | } | Without that change, some messages can be lost when aggregator service has more then one thread. Pavel View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121292#4121292 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121292

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: jboss-app/module-order

by dimitris＠jboss.org

If I remember correctly, due to the deployer changes it didn't make sense to implement it on AS5. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121271#4121271 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121271

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - jboss-app/module-order

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-5115 It's present in jboss-app_4_2.dtd but not in jboss-app_5_0.dtd. Is that by mistake or is it removed? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121267#4121267 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121267

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: A customized version of jBPM is available to evaluation

by kukeltje

Hi Nicole, If the changes are fairly isolated from each other, it is best to file jira issues as feature requests and add the patches for those features to them. That way they can be reviewed. If they are good, not only functional wise but code wise, you can even get committer access. You do have to sign the contributors agreement to get this. Looking forward to getting you on board... Regards, View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121246#4121246 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121246

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss/Tomcat Integration] - Re: JspRuntimeContext has invalid assumption of URLClassLoad

by remy.maucherat＠jboss.com

The URLs given by the URL CL are used for classpath generation (used by javac; IMO it is not a good idea to remove support for it) and for setting up the JSP security when the security manager is used (to allow it to access the JARs and classes). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121242#4121242 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121242

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: A customized version of jBPM is available to evaluation

by ntlhs

Dear Tom, the product is a debt collection management system. Concerning the other question: Yes, we are interested working with your community as well as getting our changes into the main sources of jBPM. What do we need to do, waht is necessary? Best regards, Nicole View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121224#4121224 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121224

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBossMC-2.0.0.Beta10

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Yes, its in the maven2 and jboss repositories. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121158#4121158 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121158

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Connection Sharing

by smcgowan＠redhat.com

I've been looking at an issue which is consistent with the LocalTransaction scenario described in the Connector Specification (7.10.3). In this scenario, two EJBs get a connection to the same resource manager in asingle transaction. EJB ==> Stateful Bean-Managed Bean using JTA to demarcate TX EJB1 ==> Stateful Container-Managed Bean with TX_REQUIRED attribute for business methods EJB2 ==> Stateful Container-Managed Bean with TX_REQUIRE attribute for business methods >From EJB, the first ut.begin is called. Method calls in EJB1 are performed to get a connection and delete any rows found in the table in preparation for the test. >From EJB, ut.commit is called. >From EJB, a second ut.begin call is made. a method call to EJB1.insert() is called where a connection is made to insert the row. From within this same method, a call to EJB2 dbConnect method is made. In this dbConnect method, another call to ds.getConnection() is performed. When ds.getConnection() is called, a new ManagedConnection is created resulting in two InUse connections and an attempt enlist the TX fails as multiple last resources is disallowed. The TX is aborted and marked for rollback. The resources are marked Shareable in the resource-ref elements of each EJB. Therefore, I expected that the connection handle for the same ManagedConnection instance used for handling the connection request for EJB1 would be provided by the container thus retaining the association of the local transaction context between EJB1 and EJ2 method calls.Can you confirm that should be the case with the latest version of JBoss AS 5.0.0.Beta3/4? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121117#4121117 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121117

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBossMC-2.0.0.Beta10

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : | It should be in the maven2 repo, as well as in the old CVS. | It's in the CVS. :-) But I also added it where it's supposed to be, in SVN. :-) I commited my MC changes related to this VFS change. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121108#4121108 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4121108

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2008