January 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Does JBossWS optimize local invocations?

by mageshbk＠jboss.com

Darran says: I do not believe this is actually the case, Remoting is only used to transmit the message it is not used at the server side so this optimisation is not possible. I can't find it at the moment but I think their is an outstanding WS Jira to allow in-vm optimisation. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4118146#4118146 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4118146

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Does JBossWS optimize local invocations?

by mageshbk＠jboss.com

As far as Remoting goes the invocation is localized if it is in the same process space: http://labs.jboss.com/jbossremoting/ "Local invocation - if making an invocation on a remoting server that is within the same process space, remoting will automatically make this call by reference, to improve performance." Please see http://labs.jboss.com/jbossremoting/docs/guide/ch05.html#section-http-inv... section "5.9. Configuration by properties" "BYVALUE (actual value is 'byvalue') - indicates if when making local invocations (meaning client and server invoker exists within same jvm), the marshalling will be done by value, instead of the default, by reference. Using this configuration, the marshalling will actually perform a clone of the object instance (see org.jboss.remoting.serialization.SerializationManager.createMarshalledValueForClone()). Value for this property should be of type String and be either 'true' or 'false'. In releases prior to 2.0.0, using this configuration setting would have forced invokers to be remote, which can now be done via FORCE_REMOTE config (see below). FORCE_REMOTE (actual value is 'force_remote') - indicates if when making local invocations (meaning client and server invoker exists within same jvm), the remote invokers should be used instead of local invoker. Is equivalent to making invocations as though client and server were in different jvms). Value for this property should be of type String and be either 'true' or 'false'." By default BYVALUE is false. Although these are configurable in Remoting, JBossWS does not expose these as configurable parameters to the WS developer. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4118145#4118145 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4118145

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Does JBossWS optimize local invocations?

by mageshbk＠jboss.com

Ovidiu Feodorov says: If both http/soap Webservice client and Webservice (server) are deployed in the same VM, will JBoss Remoting optimize the invocation, pass it by reference, avoiding serialization and the HTTP stack, or will serialize the invocation and send it over the HTTP stack? What is the default behavior? Can it be configured? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4118144#4118144 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4118144

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Refactoring ServerPeer

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I have made the JBMESSAGING-1189 changes in Branch_Stable. What would a release of this be tagged as? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4118140#4118140 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4118140

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Implicit marshalled values - a better way of handling re

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

Whew - talk about a healthy response to a post! :-) First though, back on to the main topic of marshalled values - Brian, I hope to have this in 2.1.0.CR3, which means you will have it for JBoss AS 5 clustering. I hope to have it enabled by default, too - let me know if this causes any issues with you. So back to the "new" topic of custom objects in Fqns! ;) I think a PFER check on a node attribute can be done just as easily as with a node - the current PFER code does a peek() and tests for a null return value. This could then do a getDirect() for specific attribs. I'm not entirely convinced about the UUID approach for entities though. Entities already have an identity - a primary key. Could we not use the entity's PK instead of UUIDs? Surely every entity PK must be mappable to DB primitives in some way, and if it is a composite PK, could we not combine the components in a Collection? This would ensure that the same ID is used cluster-wide and prevent collisions/lock timeouts as well as the need for a "dupe cleanup" thread... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4118117#4118117 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4118117

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - EJBObject/EJBLocalObject in EAP 4.2 CP02

by bdecoste

We've got some failing tests due to trying to access EJBObject/EJBLocalObject when the interfaces do not extend EJBObject/EJBLocalObject. I corrected the tests, but then realized that we're breaking backwards compatibility. How do we want to proceed? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4118114#4118114 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4118114

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: loader-repository name required in JBAS5

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Fixed in trunk. Just needed to validate the name and not create an ObjectName if null. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4118113#4118113 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4118113

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Shutdown hooks

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

Ok, fair enough. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4118108#4118108 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4118108

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: NPE booting Embedded JBoss from trunk

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : The problem is related to the StateCreationAspect not being applied when the jms activation connection is created. Its in the aop config that is loaded, but seems to be applied too late. Ok. I had a poke around in the messaging code but I wasn't able to spot anything that would cause this (I don't know the code so that's not surprising). My guess is that it's a classloading issue as Clerbert says (as this is how Embedded differs most from AS). If anyone who does know the code can spare some time to help with this let me know offline and I can walk you through how to reproduce this etc. Otherwise, I guess we just have to release Embedded beta3 and label JMS/Messaging as not working. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4118101#4118101 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4118101

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: NoCopyNestedJarHandler usage

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : "scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : I'm still using the vfs version linked to trunk, so I'm not sure if you fixed this Ales. | | | Fixed what? | I didn't do any release if that's what you mean, since I was waiting for this CL tests + some sort of caching. | Fixed the code that is calling new File(URI) when URI contains a query. For whatever reason this File ctor will not accept such a URI even though its valid. We need to strip off any query, fragment and authentication for the URI to be accepted. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4118080#4118080 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4118080

18 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2008