November 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Reflect BeanInfo cache change breaks Kernel

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

Can you let me know when you have commited this? I'd like to run the aop tests in AS trunk with this just to make double sure View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192077#4192077 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192077

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: UserTransactedStartedListener is not implemented in EJB3

by adrian＠jboss.org

"wolfc" wrote : Why is EJB2UserTransactionProvider not part of the transaction-spi? | | Shouldn't the EJB2UserTransactionProvider bean define a dependency on the UserTransactionRegistry? No its an incallback. | <bean name="UserTransactionRegistry" class="org.jboss.tm.usertx.UserTransactionRegistry"> | | THIS REGISTERS ALL USER TRANSACTION PROVIDERS | |  | <incallback method="addProvider"/> | <uncallback method="removeProvider"/> | | THIS REGISTERS THE LISTENERS (Currently only the CCM) | |  | <incallback method="addListener"/> | <uncallback method="removeListener"/> | </bean> | That way you can remove the ejb and jca configs without having to redo the other configurations. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192074#4192074 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192074

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - JBM 2 log and ESB

by timfox

Just a wild thought- Have you thought about using the JBM 2.0 fast log for your ESB message store? If JBM and ESB is running on the same machine, you could even use the same log *instance* for JBM and ESB usage - which would be better than having two log instances since the disk head wouldn't be thrashing so much. Actually, you could even have JBoss TS, JBoss ESB and JBM all using the same log instance on the same box.... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192073#4192073 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192073

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Not able to bring up JMX console

by navaljain

I am using JbossProfiler-1.0.RC3.zip for our application and follwed the instruction mentioned in readme.txt provided with it. I am unable to open the JMX console through http://localhost:8080/jmx-console as the ZIP doesn't contain jmx-console.war. Please guide me where can I find this war file. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192072#4192072 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192072

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Reflect BeanInfo cache change breaks Kernel

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : | Looks like ClassInfo is not 'immune' to different classloaders. | Should I put back CL as additional key? Putting CL back as key helps. I'll do another release + add some tests for this CL issue. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192071#4192071 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192071

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Reflect BeanInfo cache change breaks Kernel

by alesj

Looks like our change - http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=145938&start=20 to Reflect's BeanInfo caching is the cause of this: - http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/2008-November/013128.html Since when I change this in Kernel, to use 2.0.1.GA, DeploymentClassLoaderTestCase test is failing: | testDeploymentClassLoader(org.jboss.test.kernel.deployment.test.DeploymentClassLoaderTestCase) Time elapsed: 0.031 sec <<< FAILURE! | junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<org.jboss.test.classloading.vfs.VFSClassLoader@1aaf194> but was:<org.jboss.test.classloading.vfs.VFSClassLoader@e3990b> | at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47) | at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:277) | at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:64) | at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:71) | at org.jboss.test.kernel.deployment.test.DeploymentClassLoaderTestCase.testDeploymentClassLoader(DeploymentClassLoaderTestCase.java:59) | Looks like ClassInfo is not 'immune' to different classloaders. Should I put back CL as additional key? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192069#4192069 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192069

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBDEPLOY-16; generic dependency deployer

by adrian＠jboss.org

The idea of JBDEPLOY-16 was not to provide a specific mechanism for adding dependencies to a deployment but to provide some helper for other deployers that want to do it. e.g. OSGi has service dependencies at the deployment level if you use the declaritve service model If you want to provide an example of such a thing that uses text files that is ok. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192048#4192048 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192048

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: UserTransactedStartedListener is not implemented in EJB3

by wolfc

Why is EJB2UserTransactionProvider not part of the transaction-spi? Shouldn't the EJB2UserTransactionProvider bean define a dependency on the UserTransactionRegistry? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192041#4192041 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192041

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: comments on initial xsd jpdl 4

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"thomas.diesler(a)jboss.com" wrote : what is the advantage of being able to deploy a potentially invalid (i.e. not validated) process definition? That developers can just write a process without knowing the schema namespace reference and how to apply that. E.g. in unit tests it is not really practical if you're forced to refer the namespace. I don't think we should be dogmatic with schema validation. As that only validates a subset of all the constraints and validations. When parsing the process file, there are always a lot of things that can only be checked at parse time and that cannot be checked with the schema. So schema validation can not give you full coverage anyway. In the current parsing, the schema validation errors are collected and reported in a similar way as the (typically more complex) validation errors detected during interpretation of the DOM and build up of the process model. This way the designer will be able to show all the problems in the problem view one day. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192029#4192029 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192029

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: comments on initial xsd jpdl 4

by kukeltje

Sorry.. Yes, I forgot to comment on that as well... Currently the reason is kind of not neat. The xsd was not always in line with the parser, so if you wanted certain functionality, you could remove the namespace declaration from the processdefinition and xsd validating was turned off. Imo, this should not happen in jBPM 4 (nor should it have been in 3, just a lack of time to keep all in sync, including docs) So personally, I'd opt for not accepting a processdefinition if there is no namespace declaration, OR assume the latest and still validate. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4192023#4192023 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4192023

15 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2008