December 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: SubjectAuthenticationService / ActorId from JAAS

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

yes, i have the same problem with the consoles. another option would be a pluggable resolver, i.e: (pseudo code) | | interface IdentityResolver { | Identity resolve(Context ctx); | } | | Identity would then be an actor for instance, and the context might be a JASS subject. We could then provide a default resolver that delegates to JAAS. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195863#4195863 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195863

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: SubjectAuthenticationService / ActorId from JAAS

by camunda

My feeling too. Currently we started discussing around if it make sense at all to use the JAAS subject as actor. Collect pros and cons, since e.g. with asynchronous communication the JAAS-Subject is from the MDB, so somehow we should maybe "rescue" the actor-id from the first call over the JMS intermezzo... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195859#4195859 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195859

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: SubjectAuthenticationService / ActorId from JAAS

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

... and provide a proper factory as well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195854#4195854 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195854

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: SubjectAuthenticationService / ActorId from JAAS

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

I would say you fix the interface and provide noop's where applicable. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195852#4195852 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195852

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: SubjectAuthenticationService / ActorId from JAAS

by camunda

JIRA: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-1909 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195845#4195845 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195845

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - SubjectAuthenticationService / ActorId from JAAS

by camunda

In the code base there is a SubjectAuthenticationService. The intention is, that the actor-id is set to the currently logged in JAAS-Subject. Unfortunately, this isn't implemented consequently. In a current project we want to exchange the AuthenticationService, because we try to use Single-Sign-On Semantics in JBoss SOA Platform. Currently there are 3 problems: 1.) There is no SubjectAuthenticationServiceFactory, so this AuthenticationService cannot be used 2.) subject.getPrincipals(principalClass) results in a list of Principals, containing groups as well. So by the current code, the actor isn't set correctly 3.) And this is the bigger SHOWSTOPPER: The AuthenticationService interface only defines the method "getActor". But at several places jbpmContext.setActorId is called (e.g. WebConsole PhaseListener, ESB BpmProcessor, ...). This results in an exception if the DefaultAuthenticationService is not used! This makes it impracticable to exchange the AuthenticationService. So what to do at this front? I see two possibilities: a) Change the AuthenticationService interface to include a setActorId method. This can be ignored by implementations like the SubjectAuthenticationService (cannot and don't want to change the JAAS subject). b) Change the JbpmContext to ignore setActorId depending on the AuthenticationService implementation. The third possibility isn't really an option I think: Change all clients to NOT call the setActorId without any good reason. I tend to option (a). What I could imagine is, that the actorId is queries from JAAS if null, but can be overwritten with setActorId and then remembered locally. Please refer to the forum for discussion.... I will open a JIRA for it as well... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195844#4195844 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195844

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Another issue with paging:

by timfox

In PostOfficeImpl::route: | public List<MessageReference> route(final ServerMessage message) throws Exception | { | long size = pagingManager.addSize(message); | addSize is being called before the message is actually routed. If no filters match or for other reasons, the message might not actually be routed to any queues, but the size is added anyway, this is incorrect. Instead, size should be added *after* we know which message references are returned. Moreover, also the size is not taking into account the number of message references, When we discussed this before, the memory estimate was going to take into account number of refs, e.g. if number of refs == 0 memory estimate = 0 else memory estimate = message estimate + number of refs * ref estimate This doesn't seem to be the way it has been implemented. If you have a topic with 1000s of subscribers it will make a big difference View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195840#4195840 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195840

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Methods for testing only

by timfox

If methods have been marked for testing only: | /For testing only | Map<SimpleString, List<Binding>> getMappings(); | DO NOT use them in core code!! e.g.: PostOfficeImpl:load: | for (SimpleString destination : addressManager.getMappings().keySet()) | { | pagingManager.createPageStore(destination); | } | And in any case, I thought we discussed and agreed that we would create page stores lazily? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195832#4195832 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195832

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: SubProcessCancellationTest / testWithSubProcess is

by camunda

Okay, reincluded. Tests work fine locally, let's see what Hudson makes out of it... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195827#4195827 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195827

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Graphical Cut/Copy/Paste in GPD

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Please monitor https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GPD-275 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4195820#4195820 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4195820

17 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2008