December 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: What is the status of the JBoss Profiler?

by wstrater＠yahoo.com

I am having issues on running the latest release 2. I tried Beta3.SP1 and SVN revision 517. I followed the instructions in the README.txt and can not get it to work. Which forum should I use? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4194702#4194702 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4194702

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Identity] - Re: SAML Assertions (JBossESB)

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

"jkurtz.wa(a)gmail.com" wrote : All | | I would like to begin the design process to empower JBoss ESB messages to use SAML assertions. The first step would be to develop a set of requirements based on the JBoss ESB architecture and the SAML Standard. | | If we can refine these requirements and create test cases, we maybe able to submit them to be used as Compliance Tests - tests that demonstrate our application adheres to the SAML standard. XACML, another OASIS standard (but for authorization), has these and it helps development and insures credibility. | | I will get some requirements together and post them here. We can try to get at least the basic ones down and then try to design something. We should try to look into using new technology like SMOOKs and Drools to work with the SAML Assertion's XML and apply business rule. Open SAML is ok, but it is dated. | | John L Kurtz I somehow get the idea, you are lost in the wilderness, John. :) I am referring to OpenSAML v2 (latest is v2.2). It is the most up to date open source implementation of the saml v2 specification. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4194700#4194700 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4194700

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Embedded JBoss] - Re: ProfileService changes to support embedded

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Another related issue on how managed components like system properties affect launch and bootstrap: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4194697 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4194698#4194698 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4194698

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - JBAS-6286, properties management view

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6286, we should have management views for system properties. There are 3 levels of properties (at least): - jvm properties that have to be passed to the jvm launcher - system properties that need to be visible for use in bootstrap configurations - system properties that need to be visible for deployments. This is loosely the deploy/properties-service.xml, but everything in deploy would have to depend on it to make this deployed in the correct order. Moving this deployment to an earlier phase also addresses the ordering issue. Both the jvm properties and bootstrap configurations are executed before the profile service is loaded, so how that could be changed is a question. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4194697#4194697 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4194697

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Embedded JBoss] - ProfileService changes to support embedded

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Related to several discussions about how the profile service should be part of the bootstrap process, supporting embedded: ProfileService API http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=146270 Towards a canonical server: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=142477 Today's call on how the services that should be included in a unit test that relies on embedded are defined, I want to discuss how embedded and the profile service relate. Right now the bootstrap of AS itself is outside of the profile service: http://www.jboss.org/community/docs/DOC-10522 Right now I don't think any of the beans loaded during the bootstrap phase before the profile service is loaded affect JavaEE behaviors, so what deployers and beans could still fall under the ProfileServiceBootstrap. Getting the repository spi fleshed out sufficiently to allow for to include the test services from either annotation, xml, or a combination of these along with basic criteria is where we need to get to. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4194681#4194681 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4194681

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Use of jboss-reflect project

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

Using ClassInfo instead of reflection has been mentioned internally as something we will do for the next AOP release. This reminded me and I have created a JIRA issue tentatively scheduled for AOP 2.1 https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAOP-683 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4194675#4194675 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4194675

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Identity] - SAML Assertions (JBossESB)

by jkurtz.wa＠gmail.com

All I would like to begin the design process to empower JBoss ESB messages to use SAML assertions. The first step would be to develop a set of requirements based on the JBoss ESB architecture and the SAML Standard. If we can refine these requirements and create test cases, we maybe able to submit them to be used as Compliance Tests - tests that demonstrate our application adheres to the SAML standard. XACML, another OASIS standard (but for authorization), has these and it helps development and insures credibility. I will get some requirements together and post them here. We can try to get at least the basic ones down and then try to design something. We should try to look into using new technology like SMOOKs and Drools to work with the SAML Assertion's XML and apply business rule. Open SAML is ok, but it is dated. John L Kurtz View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4194671#4194671 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4194671

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Use of jboss-reflect project

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

[Semi-OT]I suggest a wiki page or something listing the multitude of projects/binaries and what their purpose is. There are now so many that I'm pretty much guessing about this kind of thing, and I expect I'm in the top 10-15% of all JBoss division devs in terms of understanding this stuff. Unless this idea gets shouted down next week I'll create such a page next week starting with projects I manage. It would be good to treat the various modules in the AS source tree as if they were projects on this doc. After 5 years working on JBoss I'm still not really sure what the design intent behind some of them is. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4194669#4194669 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4194669

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Upgrading Scout/JUDDI combo

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

Do not touch AS with any upgrades of scout and bring in xmlbeans dependency. First try to understand what the problem is. This thread actually spoonfeeds you with info. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4194667#4194667 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4194667

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Declaration and deployment of threads and thread pools i

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

Hmm. There's differences between the openjdk version and the JDK6 version... I need to think about this some more. Maybe ThreadPoolExecutor is not something we should be using. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4194664#4194664 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4194664

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2008