March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: PropertyReplaceTC failing in maven

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : OK, I've managed to get things running. | Meaning all the tests pass for me as well. Nuking helped. But due to my slow network at home I didn't nuke it all. I'll probably try that on Monday, and we'll if that also resolves that tree issue. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139872#4139872 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139872

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: PropertyReplaceTC failing in maven

by alesj

OK, I've managed to get things running. But still can't use 'mvn dependency:tree'. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139871#4139871 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139871

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - New Beta releases

by alesj

I've finally managed to get all the things in place for 4 new Beta releases that I've done today: 1) JBoss-MDR 2.0.0.Beta13 - updating jboss-common-core to 2.2.4.GA 2) JBoss-VSF 2.0.0.Beta10 - updating jboss-common-core to 2.2.4.GA - introduced a bit of a hack to pass the tests -> Winz aware tests, passing allthough we cannot delete files 3) JBoss Microcontainer 2.0.0.Beta12 - updating jboss-common-core to 2.2.4.GA - updating jbossxb to 2.0.0.CR8 - using jboss-mdr 2.0.0.Beta13 - using jboss-vfs.Beta10 4) JBoss Deployers 2.0.0.Beta12 - updating jboss-common-core to 2.2.4.GA - updating jbossxb to 2.0.0.CR8 - using jboss-microcontainer 2.0.0.Beta12 - using jboss-vfs.Beta10 I would need two new versions in JIRA for Microcontainer and VFS, and map those issues that've been done for this release to those new versions. I'll also update other MC sub-projects to use this new Betas. The release notes and links to mvn will be in JIRA issues related to these releases. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139868#4139868 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139868

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Maven Version ranges - The version format

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : "pete.muir(a)jboss.org" wrote : So the language secret police tell me I'm not allowed to use an expression like "+1" here to show my support/gratitude for someones work. | | | | It's not the language police, its the noise police. :-) | It's the Ales police. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139866#4139866 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139866

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Maven Version ranges - The version format

by adrian＠jboss.org

"pete.muir(a)jboss.org" wrote : So the language secret police tell me I'm not allowed to use an expression like "+1" here to show my support/gratitude for someones work. | It's not the language police, its the noise police. :-) You only need to comment when you disagree or have something meaningful to add. Everybody on these lists has a lot more interesting things to do with their time than read endless copies of +1 e-mails. We don't vote on software at jboss.org we do it by reasoned (sometimes colourful :-) argument, testing and JFDI. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139864#4139864 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139864

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Maven Version ranges - The version format

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

So the language secret police tell me I'm not allowed to use an expression like "+1" here to show my support/gratitude for someones work. Therefore, my post should read: "Thanks Adrian, this investigation into Maven version ranges in general, and specifically into providing support for OSGi version ranges is really useful :-)" anonymous wrote : Even better IMO would be a way of specifying it is in OSGI mode for the whole POM. Actually, this wouldn't work as you would probably have non jboss projects using the standard scheme. But I don't think altering the maven schema like that will work - it would require a patched version of maven core afaik. Perhaps a chained version parsing scheme? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139862#4139862 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139862

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Maven Version Ranges - Case sensitivity

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

Surely we should stick to all upper case qualifiers as that is current convention? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139858#4139858 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139858

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Maven Version ranges - The version format

by pete.muir＠jboss.org

+1 Even better IMO would be a way of specifying it is in OSGI mode for the whole POM. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139857#4139857 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139857

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - org.jboss.ws.annotation.PortComponent

by sajhak

hi , where i can find org.jboss.ws.annotation.PortComponent class ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139856#4139856 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139856

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Maven Version Ranges - Case sensitivity

by adrian＠jboss.org

Although I don't know how lower case qualifiers play with snapshots? i.e. 1.0.0-beta-4 > 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT > 1.0.0-Beta-4 or is there a special rule? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4139855#4139855 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4139855

16 years

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008