March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: General BeanInfo annotation visitor helper?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Its a graph with cycles, still has a simple graph style visitor pattern for a spanning tree. What I'm looking for is something like: | interface BeanInfoVisitor | { | /** return true if the bean should be visited */ | boolean visit(BeanInfo bean); | void visit(BeanInfo bean, ClassInfo info); | void visit(BeanInfo bean, PropertyInfo info); | void visit(BeanInfo bean, MethodInfo info); | } | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4134600#4134600 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4134600

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBAS-5259, JMS Destination Names is showing as QueueServ

by mark.spritzler

I am also wondering if this might be related to me not getting Snapshot jars, but getting MC Beta 10 jars for some of the jars when we use the JBoss Maven snapshot repo for microcontainer? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4134596#4134596 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4134596

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBAS-5259, JMS Destination Names is showing as QueueServ

by mark.spritzler

I'll debug and check again and let you know what I see on my end. Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4134595#4134595 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4134595

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Using a CompositeMetaType for a Map with String keys?

by mark.spritzler

Adrian, I agree. The Table type is very powerful and will be needed for more complex types. I meant more avoid it unless it is 100% necessary for a property (no other obvious choice), otherwise try to use the Map, List, Simple and Generic types. I do know on our end, anytime a property will use a Table type, will require a custom adapter for it. Whereas, using the other types we have more generic adapters already created which will handle them. Again, don't code for us here, I was just pointing this out. :) Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4134594#4134594 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4134594

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JBVFS 2.0.0.Beta10/2.0.0.CR1 releases

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

That still relies on a JarFile/ZipFile, which has native methods and is not serializable. I don't know why this has not been updated to a pure java implementation by now. The harmony impl is no different: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/arch... There are java impls of zip/jar archives out there, I looked at a couple when starting the vfs work but they were not what I was looking for. Everything can be done off of the JarInputStream/ZipInputStream, but its not the most efficient. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4134590#4134590 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4134590

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Attributes problem

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

No, that's not what I meant. Something like the following. <key class='x'><array/></key> Although, it may not be useful in this example. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4134587#4134587 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4134587

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Attributes problem

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alex.loubyansky(a)jboss.com" wrote : I thought that setting wrapper's attributes on other child elements (defined by @JBossXmlChild) would also be desired. Isn't it? | In addition it may be even simpler to implement it this way. Yes it is simpler, but its not what I want ;-) I don't want people to have to write | <key><value class="x">cdata</value></key> | when they can do | <key class="x">cdata</key> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4134580#4134580 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4134580

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: how crucial are exception handlers ?

by estaub

I think it's really important to get rigorous about defining transaction behavior. The default transaction scope across nodes needs to be obvious to the process author. Currently, if I'm not mistaken, the transaction scope is controlled mostly by whether activities are synchronous or not, i.e., by whether a transition is taken within the execute() method of an activity, or a transition is taken because of some external event (e.g., a simple timer node). This is a detail of the implementation of the activity that may not be obvious to the process author. Similarly, the interaction between rollbacks in delegation classes and PVM's process-state persistence needs to be clear. Since Bonita doesn't even allow transactions to span activities, this probably isn't a concern there - it's mostly an issue for JPDL or anything else that tries to address "microflow" requirements. -Ed Staub View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4134577#4134577 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4134577

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: XmlElementWrapper tests

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

Yes, I was thinking in terms of a JavaBean. By the item particle I meant the particle for the component. Like this is done in case there is @JBossXmlModelGroup. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4134572#4134572 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4134572

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: XmlElementWrapper tests

by adrian＠jboss.org

The testcase is CollectionWithValues. (remove the modification then you'll see it fail) Its not a javabean its a real collection and it doesn't have "items" it has an add() operation. :-) | @XmlType() | @JBossXmlNoElements | @JBossXmlChildren | ({ | @JBossXmlChild(name="array", type=AbstractArrayMetaData.class), | @JBossXmlChild(name="collection", type=AbstractCollectionMetaData.class), | @JBossXmlChild(name="inject", type=AbstractDependencyValueMetaData.class), | @JBossXmlChild(name="list", type=AbstractListMetaData.class), | @JBossXmlChild(name="map", type=AbstractMapMetaData.class), | @JBossXmlChild(name="null", type=AbstractValueMetaData.class), | @JBossXmlChild(name="set", type=AbstractSetMetaData.class), | @JBossXmlChild(name="this", type=ThisValueMetaData.class), | @JBossXmlChild(name="value", type=StringValueMetaData.class) | }) | @JBossXmlChildWildcard(wrapper=AbstractValueMetaData.class, property="value") | public class AbstractCollectionMetaData extends AbstractTypeMetaData | implements Collection<MetaDataVisitorNode>, Serializable | If you think it is confusing then we could condition it on @JBossXMLNoElements or something that identifies it for this usecase? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4134568#4134568 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4134568

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008