March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Field injection tests

by alesj

"scott.stark(a)jboss.org" wrote : See the updated org.jboss.test.kernel.deployment.support.container.* classes with BeanContainer, BeanPool, etc. | This BeanPool class looks pretty broken: | public synchronized T createBean() | throws Throwable | { | if(pool.size() == 0) | { | // Fill the pool | for(int n = 0; n < pool.size(); n ++) | { | T bean = (T) factory.createBean(); | pool.put(bean); | } | } | return pool.take(); | } | The pool field is never instantiated - unless you're gonna do field injection. And you have an if on size == 0, and then you iterate till size - which is 0. OK, I know it's a test class. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138182#4138182 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138182

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Field injection tests

by adrian＠jboss.org

Scott, can you leave this until after I do the Beta11 release tomorrow? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138181#4138181 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138181

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Don't use internal JDK classes

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : Very Wrong: | | http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/projects/microcontaine... | | Yeah, didn't follow that was Sun's class. :-( | btw: what other JDK are you running MC against? I didn't have to (most other JDKs use Sun's classes anyway :-) sun.* is unsupported stuff com.sun.* is their stable api - but even then don't use it unless it is pluggable/replacable. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138179#4138179 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138179

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Field injection tests

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

See the updated org.jboss.test.kernel.deployment.support.container.* classes with BeanContainer, BeanPool, etc. I'll work on an example testcase around these as I have to get some things straight anyway. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138177#4138177 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138177

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Don't use internal JDK classes

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : Very Wrong: | http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/jbossas/projects/microcontaine... Yeah, didn't follow that was Sun's class. :-( btw: what other JDK are you running MC against? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138175#4138175 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138175

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Field injection tests

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Yes, I saw that. I'm just combining the pool with a custom bean factory to setup test usages to validate where the separation between the containers and the mc dependency layer is going to be. I'll separate the pool in the support classes to mirror that usage as a starting point. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138173#4138173 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138173

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Field injection tests

by adrian＠jboss.org

I don't know what you are trying to do? The pool is not supposed to be part of the MC. As both Carlo and I said on the ejb3 list, all that is required is that the BeanFactory gets injected into the pool which ejb3 will implement. http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=131424&postdays=... in many different ways. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138172#4138172 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138172

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Field injection tests

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Its the xml I showed in this beanfactory extensions thread: http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=132158 I checked in a test org.jboss.test.kernel.deployment.support.container.TestPooledBeanFactory with a simple bounded queue pool that is prefilled on first use. The disconnect between the xml and any current psuedo code is that there is a one to one association between the bean metadata/xml and the instances upon which injection happens. To exercise the pool exhaustion scenario, you have to create multiple instances of Bean2Type, injecting multiple instances of Bean1Type. This behavior is not part of the current mc core. The test needs to wire things up at the metadata level and then call the org.jboss.test.kernel.deployment.support.container.BeanContainer.getBean() multiple times to create the Bean2Type instances which should have new Bean1Type instances injected. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138171#4138171 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138171

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: AS Components Bound to AS Release Cycle

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

There should not be AS projects in the parent pom. Only spis and thirdparty dependencies. If it has to be in jboss-as-dependency-matrix due to ejb3, webservices, or other project integration dependencies, then the project either needs an spi added to integration, or broken out like naming was. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138169#4138169 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138169

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Help with microcontainer changes

by smcgowan＠redhat.com

jboss-container.jar and jboss-metadata-container.jar have been replaced by jboss-mdr.jar The jboss-container-metadata.jar classes were included in jbossall-client.jar as seen in build-distr.xml. Are there plans to now add the contents of jboss-mdr.jar in jbossall-client.jar? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138162#4138162 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138162

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008