March 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Integration metro

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Being curious about why the metro integration requires sun-jaxws=2.1.3 I did a scan in wsit | [tdiesler@tddell glassfish-metro]$ ls wsit/wsit/lib/runtime | activation.jar jaxb-api.jar jaxrpc-spi.jar jsr173_1.0_src.zip README-BIN.txt sjsxp-src.zip txnannprocessor.jar | activation-src.zip jaxb-api-src.zip jaxws-api-doc.zip jsr173_api.jar resolver.jar special-README.txt txnannprocessor-src.zip | CVS jaxb-impl.jar jaxws-api.jar jsr181-api.jar resolver-src.zip stax-ex.jar wstx-asl-3.2.1.jar | FastInfoset.jar jaxb-impl.src.zip jaxws-api-src.zip jsr181-api.src.zip saaj-api.jar stax-ex-src.zip wstx-src-3.2.1.zip | FastInfoset.src.zip jaxr-api.jar jaxws-local-transport.jar jsr250-api.jar saaj-api-src.zip stax-utils.jar xmldsig.jar | http.jar jaxr-impl.jar jaxws-local-transport-src.zip mail-1.4.jar saaj-impl.jar stax-utils-src.zip xmlsec.jar | jaxb1-impl.jar jaxrpc-api.jar jaxws-rt.jar mimepull.jar saaj-impl.src.zip streambuffer.jar xws-security.jar | jaxb-api-doc.zip jaxrpc-impl.jar jaxws-rt.src.zip mimepull-src.zip sjsxp.jar streambuffer.src.zip xws-security.src.zip | It seems natural that wsit comes with all its dependencies, which would make a seperate download of these artifacts redundant (if not incorrect) Why do we have this dependency on sun-jaxws and if it is needed how does it relate to the wsit build and our deployment? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138075#4138075 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138075

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: AOP-MC-INT Beta Release

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

I have created https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/microcontainer/branches/jaxb... with the jaxb changes, and will attempt to rollback the tests in trunk. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138074#4138074 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138074

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: Shared Parent POM for dependencyManagement

by ALRubinger

"pgier" wrote : I think I like component-matrix better ;-) Or maybe dependency-matrix. Just "dependency" by itself seems too generic. I agree. Renamed to 'component-matrix', with artifactId 'jboss-as-component-matrix'. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138073#4138073 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138073

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Field injection tests

by alesj

OK, I've pretty much ran out of ideas what else to test with field injection. This are the following things that I've done: Reflection 1) Nested bean property/field usage - BeanInfoUtilTestCase 2) Running over all modes - BeanInfoUnitTestCase 3) Access restriction - AccessRestrictionTestCase (needs fixing :-)) Kernel 1) BeanAccessMode introduciton - Bean(Factory)TestCase::testBean(Factory)WithAccessMode 2) Field dependency via property injection - PropertyFieldDependency(2)TestCase - GenericBeanFactoryFieldPropertyDependency(2)TestCase 3 ) Field callbacks - CallbackCollectionFields(2)TestCase 4) Basic field annotation support - BasicFieldAnnotationSupportTestCase - SimpleFieldTestCase 5) Field access restriction - FieldAccessTestCase 6) AOP + field injection - FieldAccessTestCase (in AOP-MC-int) 7) Preinstantiated collections and fields - PreInstantiatedFields(XML)TestCase If you have any other ideas - which I'm sure you have - let me know. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138072#4138072 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138072

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: AOP-MC-INT Beta Release

by adrian＠jboss.org

Ok, let me know what you decide and when it is done. I want to do the beta release tomorrow. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138071#4138071 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138071

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Generics again

by adrian＠jboss.org

Ales, I still don't think you've groked generics. Like I said before, generics is not a way to avoid having to write a cast. Its for telling the compiler what you are doing. I just upgraded to your latest test code in jboss-reflect which uses generics yet there are 60 errors due to "unsafe type usage". Something is very wrong. Try using eclipse (with all the generics warnings turned on) if you can't get IDEA to run -XLint from the JDK compiler. That way you'll learn how to correctly use generics. For now I've just added @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") which should really only be used when the generics are a good idea but you can't actually use them, e.g. because reflection/serialization looses the type. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138070#4138070 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138070

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: AOP-MC-INT Beta Release

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

Oh, I commited the new aop-mc-int schema, but there are some problems with it which I was going to raise in another thread. I will roll it back to the original version pre-xsd:redefine View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138066#4138066 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138066

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: AOP-MC-INT Beta Release

by adrian＠jboss.org

"kabir.khan(a)jboss.com" wrote : I don't have a concrete list, but most of the tests will currently be failing since I have rewritten them to work with the JAXB parsing. | What do we need to do to get them working again? Or can I just release aop-mc-int without running the tests? ;-( This is a beta release, so if you are happy it isn't broken (I don't know how you would know? :-), I'd be ok with getting the tests working again in the next beta. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138065#4138065 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138065

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: AOP-MC-INT Beta Release

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

I don't have a concrete list, but most of the tests will currently be failing since I have rewritten them to work with the JAXB parsing. Apart from that I have not reaally touched the core of aop-mc-int, merely added BeanMetaDataFactories to the new org.jboss.aop.microcontainer.beans.metadata package View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138063#4138063 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138063

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: beanfactory extensions

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Raise a JIRA issue to turn this into a proper spi. http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-271 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138061#4138061 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138061

18 years

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums March 2008